A quality improvement approach to the reduction of HIV-related stigma and discrimination in healthcare settings
40
Citation
30
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
HIV-related stigma and discrimination (S&D) in healthcare settings represents a potent barrier to achieving global aims to end the HIV epidemic, particularly in Southeast Asia (Cambodia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Thailand and Vietnam). Evidence-based approaches for measuring and reducing S&D in healthcare settings exist, but their incorporation into routine practice remains limited, in part due to a lack of attention to how unique organisational practices—beyond the knowledge and attitudes of individuals—may abet and reinforce S&D. Application of a quality improvement (QI) approach in which facilities leverage routine measurement of S&D among healthcare workers and people living with HIV, team-based learning, root cause analysis, and tests of change offers a novel means through which to address S&D in local contexts and develop interventions to address individual-level and organisation-level drivers of S&D. To support the adoption of a QI approach to S&D reduction, the Southeast Asia Stigma Reduction QI Learning Network was launched with Ministries of Health from Cambodia, Lao PDR, Thailand and Vietnam, to co-develop strategies for implementing QI activities in participating facilities. Since the inception of Network activities in 2017, Ministry-led QI activities to address S&D have been implemented in 83 facilities and 29 provinces across participating countries. Moreover, 27 strategies and interventions have been tested to date and are being evaluated for scale up by participating facilities, spanning multiple drivers and organisational domains. Lessons learned through Network activities offer national-level and facility-level HIV programmes best practices for implementing a QI approach to S&D reduction.Keywords:
Stigma
Leverage (statistics)
Multilevel interventions, implemented at the individual, physician, clinic, health-care organization, and/or community level, increasingly are proposed and used in the belief that they will lead to more substantial and sustained changes in behaviors related to cancer prevention, detection, and treatment than would single-level interventions. It is important to understand how intervention components are related to patient outcomes and identify barriers to implementation. Designs that permit such assessments are uncommon, however. Thus, an important way of expanding our knowledge about multilevel interventions would be to assess the impact of interventions at different levels on patients as well as the independent and synergistic effects of influences from different levels. It also would be useful to assess the impact of interventions on outcomes at different levels. Multilevel interventions are much more expensive and complicated to implement and evaluate than are single-level interventions. Given how little evidence there is about the value of multilevel interventions, however, it is incumbent upon those arguing for this approach to do multilevel research that explicates the contributions that interventions at different levels make to the desired outcomes. Only then will we know whether multilevel interventions are better than more focused interventions and gain greater insights into the kinds of interventions that can be implemented effectively and efficiently to improve health and health care for individuals with cancer. This chapter reviews designs for assessing multilevel interventions and analytic ways of controlling for potentially confounding variables that can account for the complex structure of multilevel data.
Multilevel modelling
Cite
Citations (59)
Stigma is one of the greatest challenges facing people with severe mental illness (smi) and can have profound psychological, social and professional consequences. AIM: To systematically review the evidence of effectiveness of anti-stigma interventions (anti-stigma campaigns and specific interventions to reduce public stigma and self-stigma) for people with smi and to make recommendations for clinical practice. METHOD: A systematic literature search for individual studies and reviews concerning the efficacy of interventions that reduce stigma for people with smi. RESULTS: Anti-stigma interventions have small-to-medium effects. Although head-to-head comparisons do not show a clear advantage for educational or contact interventions, results suggest that the elements of contact, recovery and continuity (for public stigma) and psycho-education (for self-stigma) may yield the greatest effects. Due to the short follow-up period of most studies, there is limited evidence on the long-term effectiveness of these interventions. More specifically, it remains unknown whether these interventions lead to changes in actual behavior. CONCLUSION: Anti-stigma interventions have limited effects on knowledge, attitudes and behavior. Several methodological shortcomings, as well as short follow-up periods in most studies, preclude making firm conclusions.
Stigma
Social stigma
Cite
Citations (1)
70% of medication errors occurring in the hospitals are preventable. The study was aimed to document, classify and examine interventions and examine reasons as to why pharmacists initiate changes in drug therapy and the outcomes of interventions, also examine the acceptability of interventions to analyze if intervention study can be a reliable learning process and to identify the areas of weakness in case of ineffective interventions. Interventions were broadly classified into Reactive interventions and Passive interventions. The study was conducted for six months. A total of 470 interventions were recorded in this study. Out of these 470 interventions, 104 were reactive interventions and 366 were passive interventions. Out of 92 outcome assessed interventions, the outcomes were beneficial in (91.30%) and had no effect in (8.70%). Active involvement of clinical pharmacists in the wards helps physicians in taking better therapeutic decisions which highlights areas where clinical pharmacists could prove their skill and knowledge to achieve better patient outcomes.
Cite
Citations (0)
Stigma
Cite
Citations (0)
Summary The purpose of this article was to review physical activity interventions done with Hispanic American girls and women that were published between 1994 and 2007, and suggest ways of enhancing these interventions. A total of 12 such interventions were found. Majority of the interventions focused on both physical activity and nutrition behaviours. Only half of the interventions were based on a behavioural theory. Social cognitive theory was the most popular theory, which was operationalized by four interventions. The interventions ranged from 3 weeks to 2 years in duration. The impact was not necessarily linked to the length of the intervention. The most popular physical activity that was promoted was walking, which was utilized by four interventions. Most of the interventions utilized a classroom format for imparting instruction in being physically active. All the interventions utilized individual‐level behaviour change as an approach, and none tried to address broader policy and environmental‐level changes. Process evaluation was done by very few interventions and must be done more systematically. In terms of the impact, half of the interventions were successful in influencing the outcomes. Recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of physical activity interventions in Hispanic American girls and women are presented.
Social Cognitive Theory
Cite
Citations (22)
This chapter contains sections titled: The scope of the problem Concepts for understanding stigma Where do we learn stigma? Signals that lead to stigma Putting it all together Suggestions for challenging mental health stigma Stigma and world diversity Assessing stigma Summary
Stigma
Scope (computer science)
Cite
Citations (0)
Leverage (statistics)
Media Coverage
Argument (complex analysis)
Cite
Citations (69)
Cite
Citations (6)