logo
    Natural Selection: How Selection on Behavior Interacts with Selection on Morphology
    5
    Citation
    10
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Keywords:
    Morphology
    Trait
    Stabilizing selection
    Disruptive selection
    Abstract Two highly correlated anther traits affect pollination efficacy in a wild radish population. Does the strength and type of selection on these traits differ through male and female fitness with increased ancestral trait variation? Waterman et al. (2023) found stabilizing selection on one trait and disruptive selection on the other trait, with no difference between male and female fitness. Such quantifications of selection in populations with the increased variation that reflects ancestral trait variation provide insights into processes of trait adaptation.
    Trait
    Disruptive selection
    Variation (astronomy)
    Stabilizing selection
    Local adaptation
    Citations (0)
    The selection pressures that have shaped the evolution of complex traits in humans remain largely unknown, and in some contexts highly contentious, perhaps above all where they concern mean trait differences among groups. To date, the discussion has focused on whether such group differences have any genetic basis, and if so, whether they are without fitness consequences and arose via random genetic drift, or whether they were driven by selection for different trait optima in different environments. Here, we highlight a plausible alternative: that many complex traits evolve under stabilizing selection in the face of shifting environmental effects. Under this scenario, there will be rapid evolution at the loci that contribute to trait variation, even when the trait optimum remains the same . These considerations underscore the strong assumptions about environmental effects that are required in ascribing trait differences among groups to genetic differences.
    Trait
    Stabilizing selection
    Disruptive selection
    Genetic drift
    Human evolutionary genetics
    Stabilizing selection
    Disruptive selection
    Ecological selection
    Sexual selection in natural populations acts on highly heritable traits and tends to be relatively strong, implicating sexual selection as a causal agent in many phenotypic radiations. Sexual selection appears to be ineffectual in promoting phenotypic divergence among contemporary natural populations, however, and there is little evidence from artificial selection experiments that sexual fitness can evolve. Here, we demonstrate that a multivariate male trait preferred by Drosophila serrata females can respond to selection and results in the maintenance of male mating success. The response to selection was associated with a gene of major effect increasing in frequency from 12 to 35% in seven generations. No further response to selection, or increase in frequency of the major gene, was observed between generations 7 and 11, indicating an evolutionary limit had been reached. Genetic analyses excluded both depletion of genetic variation and overdominance as causes of the evolutionary limit. Relaxing artificial selection resulted in the loss of 52% of the selection response after a further five generations, demonstrating that the response under artificial sexual selection was opposed by antagonistic natural selection. We conclude that male D. serrata sexually selected traits, and attractiveness to D. serrata females conferred by these traits, were held at an evolutionary limit by the lack of genetic variation that would allow an increase in sexual fitness while simultaneously maintaining nonsexual fitness. Our results suggest that sexual selection is unlikely to cause divergence among natural populations without a concomitant change in natural selection, a conclusion consistent with observational evidence from natural populations.
    Disruptive selection
    Stabilizing selection
    Trait
    Citations (90)
    Natural selection is an elegantly simple concept but one that can manifest in complex ways. I review how the basic model of single-trait viability selection has been extended to more complex forms of selection on multiple traits and on reaction norms. Fitness is defined as the expected lifetime reproductive success for individuals with a given genotype or phenotype over a given range of environments. Since the reproductive success realized by any individual will include a stochastic departure from this expectation, selection is therefore a consistent difference in fitness between organisms with different characteristics. A clear distinction is drawn between selection, which can act on any phenotypic difference, and the response to selection, which can occur only if phenotypic differences are heritable. This distinction separates the action of natural selection in filtering variation from the origin of the novel variants on which selection acts. Since selection frequently acts on standing genetic variation or on conditionally neutral variation, both of which accumulate in populations before the imposition of selection, such variation accumulates independently of its fitness effects under the subsequent selection regime. Recent discussions of "Lamarckian" inheritance must be carefully circumscribed to avoid the implication of directed mutation, for which there is no evidence.
    Stabilizing selection
    Trait
    Disruptive selection
    Inheritance
    Variation (astronomy)
    Ecological selection
    Citations (23)
    Pleiotropy
    Epistasis
    Trait
    Disruptive selection
    Genetic load
    Stabilizing selection
    Truncation selection
    Adaptations, parts of phenotypes that perform various functions contributing to survival and reproduction of organisms, are products of long evolution, which proceeds through natural selection of spontaneous mutations. The key role of selection in evolution was discovered by Charles Robert Darwin and Alfred Russel Wallace, who worked independently. In the narrow, genetic sense, selection is differential reproduction of genotypes. Selection is a population-level phenomenon. Quantitative studies of selection are very difficult, due to several reasons. First, even the actual fitness of an individual is much harder to measure than almost any other quantitative trait. Then, selection is variation of inherited, and not of actual, values of fitness of individuals. Description of selection by distribution of fitness of genotypes in the population q(w) is mute on how selection acts at individual polymorphic loci. When selection acts on a quantitative trait, this results, by definition, in different fitnesses of individuals that possess different values of the trait.
    Trait
    Disruptive selection
    Stabilizing selection
    Quantitative Genetics
    Citations (0)
    Natural selection is a central tenet of evolutionary theory, yet the estimation of the direction and intensity of selection remains problematic. Here, we assess the strength of selection on the early expression of a secondary sexual ornament, bill colour, in male European blackbirds (Turdus merula) using 5 years of capture-mark-recapture (CMR) data. The best-fitting model consisted of a quadratic relationship between survival rate and bill colour, indicating stabilizing natural selection on the early expression of a secondary sexual trait. There was no evidence for sexual selection acting on bill colour in the first year. We suggest that the consideration of early selection and the adoption of refined statistical methods may reveal patterns of selection in the wild that have, as yet, remained undetected.
    Trait
    Stabilizing selection
    Disruptive selection
    Migration tends to oppose the effects of divergent natural selection among populations. Numerous theoretical and empirical studies have demonstrated that this migration-selection balance constrains genetic divergence among populations. In contrast, relatively few studies have examined immigration's effects on fitness and natural selection within recipient populations. By constraining local adaptation, migration can lead to reduced fitness, known as a "migration load," which in turn causes persistent natural selection. We develop a simple two-island model of migration-selection balance that, although very general, also reflects the natural history of Timema cristinae walking-stick insects that inhabit two host plant species that favor different cryptic color patterns. We derive theoretical predictions about how migration rates affect the level of maladaptation within populations (measured as the frequency of less-cryptic color-pattern morphs), which in turn determines the selection differential (the within-generation morph frequency change). Using data on color morph frequencies from 25 natural populations, we confirm previous results showing that maladaptation is higher in populations receiving more immigrants. We then present novel evidence that this increased maladaptation leads to larger selection differentials, consistent with our model. Our results provide comparative evidence that immigration elevates the variance in fitness, which in turn leads to larger selection differentials, consistent with Fisher's Theorem of Natural Selection. However, we also find evidence that recurrent adult migration between parapatric populations may tend to obscure the effects of selection.
    Maladaptation
    Local adaptation
    Parapatric speciation
    Directional selection
    Disruptive selection
    Stabilizing selection
    Natural selection is an elegantly simple concept but one that can manifest in complex ways. I review how the basic model of single-trait viability selection has been extended to more complex forms of selection on multiple traits and on reaction norms. Fitness is defined as the expected lifetime reproductive success for individuals with a given genotype or phenotype over a given range of environments. Since the reproductive success realized by any individual will include a stochastic departure from this expectation, selection is therefore a consistent difference in fitness between organisms with different characteristics. A clear distinction is drawn between selection, which can act on any phenotypic difference, and the response to selection, which can occur only if phenotypic differences are heritable. This distinction separates the action of natural selection in filtering variation from the origin of the novel variants on which selection acts. Since selection frequently acts on standing genetic variation or on conditionally neutral variation, both of which accumulate in populations before the imposition of selection, such variation accumulates independently of its fitness effects under the subsequent selection regime. Recent discussions of “Lamarckian” inheritance must be carefully circumscribed to avoid the implication of directed mutation, for which there is no evidence.
    Disruptive selection
    Stabilizing selection
    Trait
    Inheritance
    Variation (astronomy)
    Citations (1)