Why mixed groundwater at the outlet of open flowing wells in unconfined-aquifer basins can represent deep groundwater: implications for sampling in long-screen wells
9
Citation
51
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Keywords:
Groundwater discharge
Groundwater model
Inflow
Aquifer test
Water well
Cone of depression
The hydraulic and hydrogeological features of the Caposele aquifer have been investigated by using a numerical groundwater flow model. In particular, groundwater flow simulations were performed for a multilayered, unconfined aquifer in steady-state conditions for different thicknesses of the aquifer’s saturated zone. The Caposele groundwater model was carried out starting from a generic model drained by a unique spring outlet in accordance with the geo-hydrological features of the study area. The conceptual model was built considering hydrogeological features of spring catchment, and was then implemented with the MODFLOW numerical code. A combined 2D-3D approach was adopted, and the model was calibrated on borehole data available for the time period 2012–2019. Different thicknesses of the aquifer were set, and a reliable relationship was found between the hydraulic head, saturated zone and hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer. Using the MODPATH package, the mean travel time (Darcian) of groundwater was computed for five different scenarios, corresponding to the model’s depths; the analysis that was performed shows that the travel time is higher for a greater and lower for a smaller thickness of the aquifer’s saturated zone, respectively. The Caposele aquifer model was zoned in different sectors, named flow pipe areas, that play different roles in groundwater recharge-discharge processes. A vector analysis was also carried out in order to highlight the ascendant flow near the spring zone.
MODFLOW
Groundwater model
Groundwater discharge
Aquifer test
Cone of depression
Hydraulic head
Slug test
Cite
Citations (9)
First posted February 21, 2018 For additional information, contact: Director, South Atlantic Water Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 720 Gracern Road Columbia, SC 29210 The U.S. Geological Survey collects groundwater data and conducts studies to monitor hydrologic conditions, define groundwater resources, and address problems related to water supply, water use, and water quality. In Georgia, water levels were monitored continuously at 157 wells during calendar years 2015 and 2016. Because of missing data or short periods of record (less than 5 years) for several of these wells, data for 147 wells are presented in this report. These wells include 15 in the surficial aquifer system, 18 in the Brunswick aquifer system and equivalent sediments, 59 in the Upper Floridan aquifer, 13 in the Lower Floridan aquifer and underlying units, 9 in the Claiborne aquifer, 1 in the Gordon aquifer, 8 in the Clayton aquifer, 16 in the Cretaceous aquifer system, 2 in Paleozoic-rock aquifers, and 6 in crystalline-rock aquifers. Data from the well network indicate that water levels generally rose during the 10-year period from 2007 through 2016, with water levels rising in 105 wells and declining in 31 wells; insufficient data prevented determination of a 10-year trend in 11 wells. Water levels declined over the long-term period of record at 80 wells, increased at 62 wells, and remained relatively constant at 5 wells.In addition to continuous water-level data, periodic water-level data were collected and used to construct potentiometric-surface maps for the Upper Floridan aquifer in the Brunswick–Glynn County area during October 2015 and October 2016 and in the Albany–Dougherty County area during December 2015 and November and December 2016. Periodic water-level measurements were also collected and used to construct potentiometric-surface maps for the Cretaceous aquifer system in the Augusta–Richmond County area during July 2015 and June 2016. In general, water levels in the Upper Floridan aquifer were higher during 2015 than during 2016 in the Brunswick–Glynn County and Albany–Dougherty County areas due to higher precipitation during 2015. Water levels were lower, however, during 2015 than during 2016 in the Cretaceous aquifer system in the Augusta–Richmond County area.In the Brunswick area, maps showing the chloride concentration of water in the Upper Floridan aquifer constructed using data collected from 33 wells during October 2015 and from 30 wells during October 2016 indicate that chloride concentrations remained above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s secondary drinking-water standard in an approximately 2-square-mile area. During calendar years 2015–16, chloride concentrations generally were similar to those measured during 2012–14; however, some wells did show an increase in chloride concentration, likely due to increases in pumping.
Surficial aquifer
Aquifer test
Water well
Geological survey
Cone of depression
Cite
Citations (4)
This chapter introduces the occurrence of groundwater and the principles of groundwater flow, including radial flow to water wells. A geological formation that is able to store and transmit groundwater in useful quantities is called an aquifer. Aquifers can be divided into three broad classes: crystalline aquifers, consolidated aquifers and unconsolidated aquifers. Groundwater under natural conditions flows from areas of recharge, normally the aquifer's outcrop area, to points of discharge at springs, rivers or in the sea. The driving force of groundwater flow is the hydraulic gradient-the difference in head between the recharge and discharge areas, divided by the length of the flow path. The flow of water through the saturated zone of an aquifer can be represented by the Darcy equation. This most fundamental equation of groundwater flow is empirical: it is based on Darcy's experimental observations of flow through sand filters in the 1850s.
Groundwater discharge
Aquifer test
Groundwater model
Hydraulic head
Cone of depression
Cite
Citations (0)
ABSTRACT: A variable change is used to convert drawdown formulas for isotropic aquifers for use where the aquifer is anisotropic. Contours of the cone of depression assume an oval configuration with the major and minor axes oriented in the directions for which the permeability is greated and least. The case of a well pumped at a constant rate, the case of a well drawing water at a constant rate from an aquifer with a leaky roof and the flowing artesian well case are treated. In all cases the well is considered to completely penetrate the aquifer.
Cone of depression
Aquifer test
Drawdown (hydrology)
Constant (computer programming)
Water well
Cite
Citations (7)
Drawdown (hydrology)
Water well
Aquifer properties
Aquifer test
Slug test
Cone of depression
Water pumping
Specific storage
Cite
Citations (3)
A solution for the drawdown in a large‐diameter well discharging at a constant rate from a homogeneous isotropic artesian aquifer, which also takes into consideration the water derived from storage within the well, is presented. A set of type curves computed from this solution permits a determination of the transmissibility of the aquifer by analysis of drawdown observed in the pumped well.
Drawdown (hydrology)
Aquifer test
Transmissibility (structural dynamics)
Constant (computer programming)
Water well
Cone of depression
Cite
Citations (507)
Aquifer test
Cone of depression
Groundwater model
Groundwater discharge
Aquifer properties
Geothermal heating
Specific storage
Cite
Citations (13)
Transmissibility (structural dynamics)
Cone of depression
Aquifer test
Water well
Specific storage
Cite
Citations (36)
ABSTRACT The analysis of flow to a flowing nonpenetrating well in a leaky artesian aquifer was obtained. A method has been suggested to determine the aquifer parameters using the pump‐test data on such wells with constant drawdown in the well. A technique is also suggested to determine the aquifer parameters using the well itself as the observation well.
Drawdown (hydrology)
Aquifer test
Constant (computer programming)
Transient (computer programming)
Water well
Transient flow
Cite
Citations (1)
Quantitative investigations, including two aquifer tests and development of a three-dimensional (3D) groundwater flow model, were required to determine the hydraulic connection between an irrigation reservoir and a buried valley aquifer in southern Alberta. Evidence of seepage was detected in the buried valley aquifer 10 km east of the Pine Coulee reservoir at the onset of filling in 1999, when the reservoir level exceeded an elevation of 1035 m above sea level (a.s.l.). Concern for an increase in the local water table and the creation of artesian conditions in the aquifer prompted this study to determine the approximate location of a seepage window that appeared to be connecting the reservoir and aquifer. Observations of hydraulic head in the aquifer during the pumping tests revealed a barrier boundary when the reservoir level was at an elevation of 1035 m a.s.l. and a recharge boundary condition when the elevation exceeded 1039 m a.s.l. These data were used to calibrate a 3D groundwater flow model, which was needed to determine the hydraulic properties and approximate location of the leakage zone. The quantitative investigation showed that seepage likely occurred through the sideslopes of the flooded coulee, rather than through the low-permeability coulee floor sediments or the embankment dam. Further simulations illustrated the expected seepage rates at various reservoir supply levels and the pumping rates required for relief wells installed in the buried valley aquifer to maintain historic aquifer hydraulic head. A brief postanalysis indicated that the forecasted pumping rates were only 15% lower than have been required to maintain preconstruction water levels in the buried valley aquifer.Key words: dams, seepage analysis, groundwater modelling, buried valley aquifer, pumping test.
Aquifer test
Hydraulic head
Groundwater model
Cone of depression
Aquifer properties
Groundwater discharge
Elevation (ballistics)
Cite
Citations (5)