If you can’t measure it- you can’t change it – a longitudinal study on improving quality of care in hospitals and health centers in rural Kenya
Michael MarxChristine NitschkeMaureen NafulaMabel NangamiMarc BrodowskiIrmgard MarxHelen PrytherchCharles KandieIrene OmogiFriederike Paul-FariborzJoachim Szécsényi
12
Citation
13
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
The Kenyan Ministry of Health- Department of Standards and Regulations sought to operationalize the Kenya Quality Assurance Model for Health. To this end an integrated quality management system based on validated indicators derived from the Kenya Quality Model for Health (KQMH) was developed and adapted to the area of Reproductive and Maternal and Neonatal Health, implemented and analysed. An integrated quality management (QM) approach was developed based on European Practice Assessment (EPA) modified to the Kenyan context. It relies on a multi-perspective, multifaceted and repeated indicator based assessment, covering the 6 World Health Organization (WHO) building blocks. The adaptation process made use of a ten step modified RAND/UCLA appropriateness Method. To measure the 303 structure, process, outcome indicators five data collection tools were developed: surveys for patients and staff, a self-assessment, facilitator assessment, a manager interview guide. The assessment process was supported by a specially developed software (VISOTOOL®) that allows detailed feedback to facility staff, benchmarking and facilitates improvement plans. A longitudinal study design was used with 10 facilities (6 hospitals; 4 Health centers) selected out of 36 applications. Data was summarized using means and standard deviations (SDs). Categorical data was presented as frequency counts and percentages. A baseline assessment (T1) was carried out, a reassessment (T2) after 1.5 years. Results from the first and second assessment after a relatively short period of 1.5 years of improvement activities are striking, in particular in the domain 'Quality and Safety' (20.02%; p < 0.0001) with the dimensions: use of clinical guidelines (34,18%; p < 0.0336); Infection control (23,61%; p < 0.0001). Marked improvements were found in the domains 'Clinical Care' (10.08%; p = 0.0108), 'Management' (13.10%: p < 0.0001), 'Interface In/out-patients' (13.87%; p = 0.0246), and in total (14.64%; p < 0.0001). Exemplarily drilling down the domain 'clinical care' significant improvements were observed in the dimensions 'Antenatal care' (26.84%; p = 0.0059) and 'Survivors of gender-based violence' (11.20%; p = 0.0092). The least marked changes or even a -not significant- decline of some was found in the dimensions 'delivery' and 'postnatal care'. This comprehensive quality improvement approach breathes life into the process of collecting data for indicators and creates ownership among users and providers of health services. It offers a reflection on the relevance of evidence-based quality improvement for health system strengthening and has the potential to lay a solid ground for further certification and accreditation.Keywords:
Health administration
Benchmarking
Health Services Research
Background Fifteen years ago in Health Services Research (1999) qualitative research methods were argued to be useful and valid. Since that time qualitative research methods have gained increasing legitimacy however qualitative research papers remain underrepresented in high impact health journals [1]. The rigour of qualitative methods and their relevance in policy evaluation and development is, however, a continuing debate. On the one hand, qualitative inquiry methods bring the complexity of health service policy impacts to the fore; they provide policy makers with perspectives from the people services aim to support. On the other hand, the variability of qualitative approaches can lead to questions around validity and utility of findings. Narrative inquiry is one qualitative approach which, like others, has no prescribed method. Yet it is a method gaining increasing popularity in social science, clinical and health services research. This paper makes the methodological case for narrative inquiry in health services research and recommends techniques.
Health administration
Health Services Research
Cite
Citations (2)
The Hong Kong Hospital Authority (HA) introduced a Pay-for-Performance (P4P) resource- allocation policy using a Casemix system in late 2008. Clinicians played a vital role in its implementation, especially with regard to the accuracy of clinical data. The purpose of this study was to:
1. Assess the short-term impact of Casemix-based funding as perceived by clinicians on clinical practice and quality of patient care after one year of implementation.
2. Examine any association between the characteristics of the clinicians (rank and specialty) and their perceived impact of the Casemix system on clinical service.
3. Identify the barriers encountered by clinicians on the effective implementation of this new policy.
Health administration
Specialty
Clinical Governance
Cite
Citations (1)
Norwegian
Health administration
Health Services Research
Population Health
Cite
Citations (0)
Health administration
Health Services Research
Cite
Citations (1)
Background Some currently provided health services have an absence of evidence for effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and/or safety. These are candidates for disinvestment. It is possible that such services would prove valuable if trials were to be conducted however, making disinvestment a clear risk. Provision of these services in the context of usual care is a considerable barrier to conducting a conventional trial of these interventions. Our team has recently developed a novel research approach to conduct a trial in this context [1]. In this paper, we describe the first application of this design. Allied health services include those provided by a range of health professional groups. Weekend allied health services on acute medical or surgical wards are widely provided internationally but are inconsistent in their composition and focus. There is no direct evidence of efficacy for these weekend services, and higher rates of pay on the weekend make their likely cost-effectiveness questionable. This research examines the efficacy, cost-effectiveness and safety of disinvesting from weekend allied health services on acute medical or surgical wards.
Health administration
Disinvestment
Health Economics
Health Services Research
Cite
Citations (4)
A number of different blended-payment models for primary-care delivery have been introduced in Ontario, Canada over the last decade. These models have different incentives and, therefore, have attracted different physicians and patients, depending upon their geographical location and practice characteristics.
As policy makers at the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care evaluate and consider possible changes to these models, it is important that they be able to characterize the Casemix of patients who are enrolled to them, and to understand the healthcare needs of those who have not enrolled with a primary-care model. This study evaluates a method for summarizing the Casemix of primary-care rosters, and it examines the variations of Casemix between and within the different model types.
Health administration
Christian ministry
Cite
Citations (15)
tiple language errors were identified because the typesetter didn't implement these corrections during production.The changes have been highlighted with corrections and shown in Additional file 1.
Health administration
Health Services Research
Health Economics
Cite
Citations (1)
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.
Health administration
Health Services Research
Health Economics
Healthcare service
Child Health
Cite
Citations (0)
Background Multi-disciplinary team (MDT)-working is recognized as a key modality for providing cancer services in the province of Quebec (Canada) and elsewhere [1]. Evidence suggests that the quality of teamworking varies across cancer teams and this may impact on care-providing process, and ultimately on patient care experience [2]. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effects of MDT-working on cancer patients’ perceived experience of care.
Health administration
Health Services Research
Cross-sectional study
Patient Experience
Cite
Citations (2)
Upon publication of the original article [1], Gregory Maniatopoulos' name was incorrectly given as 'Greg Maniatopoulous'. This has now been corrected in the original article.
Health administration
Health Services Research
Healthcare Policy
Cite
Citations (0)