Flattening filter-free technique in volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy: A clinical comparison with the flattening filter technique
Shuri AokiHideomi YamashitaAkihiro HagaKanabu NawaToshikazu ImaeWataru TakahashiOsamu AbeKeiichi Nakagawa
22
Citation
42
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
The present study sought to evaluate the impact of the flattening filter-free (FFF) technique in volumetric modulated arc therapy for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy. Its clinical safety and availability were compared with the flattening filter (FF) method. The cases of 65 patients who underwent lung volumetric modulated arc therapy-stereotactic body radiotherapy (VMAT-SBRT) using FF or FFF techniques were reviewed. A total of 55 Gy/4 fractions (fr) was prescribed for peripheral lesions or 56 Gy/7 fr for central lesions. The total monitor units (MU), treatment time, dose to tumors, dose to organs at risk, tumor control (local control rate, overall survival, progression-free survival) and adverse events between cases treated with FF and cases treated with the FFF technique were compared. A total of 35 patients were treated with conventional FF techniques prior to November 2014 and 30 patients were treated with FFF techniques after this date. It was revealed that the beam-on time was significantly shortened by the FFF technique (P<0.01). Other factors were similar for FFF and FF plans in respect to conformity (P=0.95), homogeneity (P=0.20) and other dosimetric values, including total MU and planning target volume/internal target volume coverage. The median follow-up period was 18 months (range, 2-35). One-year local control rates were 97.1 and 90.0% in the FF group and FFF groups, respectively (P=0.33). Grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in 5.8% of FF patients and 3.4% of FFF patients (P=1.00). No other adverse events ≥grade 3 were observed. The results of the study suggest that VMAT-SBRT using the FFF technique shortens the treatment time for lung SBRT while maintaining a high local control rate with low toxicity.Radiosurgery will celebrate its Golden Jubilee in the year 2001. More than 100,000 patients throughout the world have undergone radiosurgery since Lars Leksell first described the technique in 1951. Rapid developments in neuroimaging and even robotic technology in the past decade have contributed to improved outcomes and wider applications for radiosurgery. A variety of different radiosurgical techniques have been developed in the past two decades. Numerous studies have examined the benefits and risks of radiosurgery performed with various devices. The long-term results of radiosurgery are now available, and these results have established radiosurgery as an effective noninvasive treatment method for intracranial vascular malformations and many tumors. Additional applications of radiosurgery for the treatment of malignant tumors and functional disorders are being assessed. Radiosurgery is an impressive combination of minimally invasive technologies administered by a multidisciplinary team of surgeons, oncologists, medical physicists, and engineers.
Multidisciplinary team
Cite
Citations (76)
Cite
Citations (0)
Abstract STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY IS the single-session, precise delivery of a therapeutically effective radiation dose to an imaging-defined target. Conceived and developed during the past 5 decades, stereotactic radiosurgery has involved significant advances, which have improved patient outcomes and made it a critical component of modern neurosurgical practice and training. In this article, a short history of stereotactic surgery and radiosurgery are presented, and radiosurgery is contrasted to radiation therapy. Adherence to accepted, descriptive terms in defining stereotactic radiosurgery and radiation therapy permits a clear distinction among the results of the different radiation delivery techniques for patients, physicians, and other interested parties.
Stereotactic radiation therapy
Cite
Citations (26)
This chapter contains section titled: Introduction Rationale for stereotactic radiosurgery Does radiosurgery improve local control? Does radiosurgery improve survival? Prognostic factors for response, local control, and survival A comparison of radiosurgery and surgery Complications Conclusions
Cite
Citations (10)
Cite
Citations (3)
Arteriovenous malformation
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations
Cite
Citations (68)
Salvage therapy
Cite
Citations (0)
To present the results of arteriovenous malformation (AVM) radiosurgery using the Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) as the primary outcome measure and to analyze whether previous AVM rupture or other factors have an effect on outcomes after AVM radiosurgery.We reviewed outcomes after AVM radiosurgery for 243 patients from 1990 and 2001. The mean follow-up after radiosurgery was 65 months.Forty-one patients (17%) sustained a decline in MRS (median -2) after AVM radiosurgery. We noted a decline in MRS in 4% of patients 1 year after radiosurgery, 8% of patients at 3 years after radiosurgery, and 15% of patients at 7 years after radiosurgery. The radiosurgery-based AVM score correlated with a decline in MRS after AVM radiosurgery in multivariate testing (odds ratio 2.1; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6; p < 0.01).Previous AVM rupture did not influence neurologic deterioration after AVM radiosurgery. The radiosurgery-based AVM score predicted the chance of a worse MRS after radiosurgery.
Arteriovenous malformation
Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations
Cite
Citations (35)
Radiobiology
Cite
Citations (0)
The field of stereotactic radiosurgery is rapidly advancing as a result of both improvements in radiosurgical equipment and better physician understanding of the clinical applications of stereotactic radiosurgery. This article will review recent developments in the field of radiosurgery, including advances in our understanding of the treatment of brain metastases and arteriovenous malformations, as well as the use of stereotactic radiosurgery as a boost following conventional radiation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma to minimize the rate of local recurrence. In addition, improved understanding of the radiobiology of normal neurologic structures adjacent to tumors undergoing radiosurgery has led to the use of fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of acoustic neuromas and tumors bordering the anterior visual pathways. Finally, a breakthrough in radiosurgery involving the development and use of frameless, image-guided stereotactic radiosurgery has allowed for both dose homogeneity and treatment of intracranial lesions based on nonisocentric treatment algorithms that result in improved target conformality. This same frameless radiosurgical system has also expanded the scope of radiosurgery to include the treatment of extracranial lesions throughout the body.
Cite
Citations (59)