Caffeine ingestion acutely enhances muscular strength and power but not muscular endurance in resistance‐trained men
97
Citation
35
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Abstract The goal of this randomized, double‐blind, cross‐over study was to assess the acute effects of caffeine ingestion on muscular strength and power, muscular endurance, rate of perceived exertion (RPE), and pain perception (PP) in resistance‐trained men. Seventeen volunteers (mean ± SD: age = 26 ± 6 years, stature = 182 ± 9 cm, body mass = 84 ± 9 kg, resistance training experience = 7 ± 3 years) consumed placebo or 6 mg kg −1 of anhydrous caffeine 1 h before testing. Muscular power was assessed with seated medicine ball throw and vertical jump exercises, muscular strength with one‐repetition maximum (1RM) barbell back squat and bench press exercises, and muscular endurance with repetitions of back squat and bench press exercises (load corresponding to 60% of 1RM) to momentary muscular failure. RPE and PP were assessed immediately after the completion of the back squat and bench press exercises. Compared to placebo, caffeine intake enhanced 1RM back squat performance (+2.8%; effect size [ES] = 0.19; p = .016), which was accompanied by a reduced RPE (+7%; ES = 0.53; p = .037), and seated medicine ball throw performance (+4.3%, ES = 0.32; p = .009). Improvements in 1RM bench press were not noted although there were significant ( p = .029) decreases in PP related to this exercise when participants ingested caffeine. The results point to an acute benefit of caffeine intake in enhancing lower‐body strength, likely due to a decrease in RPE; upper‐, but not lower‐body power; and no effects on muscular endurance, in resistance‐trained men. Individuals competing in events in which strength and power are important performance‐related factors may consider taking 6 mg kg −1 of caffeine pre‐training/competition for performance enhancement.Keywords:
Bench press
Squat
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Vertical jump
The purpose of this study was to examine 10 weeks of creatine monohydrate (Cr) supplementation coupled with resistance training on body composition and strength in women trainees. Twenty-six subjects ingested Cr (n = 13) or a placebo (Pl) (n = 13) at a dose of 0.3 g.kg(-1) and 0.03 g.kg(-1) body mass for the initial 7 days and subsequent 9 weeks, respectively, while performing a resistance training program 4 days per week. Significant increases (p < 0.05) occurred in both groups for lean body mass and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press and incline leg press. There was a significant main effect for training, but there was no significant difference in the total number of repetitions completed after 5 sets of multiple repetitions to exhaustion at 70% of 1RM for bench press and incline leg press for both groups or in the ability to perform a greater training volume (sets x repetitions x load) in the Cr vs. Pl groups over the 10 weeks. The results indicate that Cr supplementation combined with 10 weeks of concurrent resistance training may not improve strength or lean body mass greater than training only. These findings may be a result of nonresponders due to gender differences or a varying biological potential to uptake Cr within the muscle.
Bench press
Creatine Monohydrate
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Creatine
Strength Training
Cite
Citations (28)
PURPOSE: Examine the chronic effects of combined creatine monohydrate supplementation and resistance training on body composition and muscle strength in older males. METHODS: Twenty non-ressitance trained males (61.05±4.95 yrs, 176.17±6.21 cm, 69.15±2.44 kg) were randomized in a double blind manner. Participants ingested either creatine monoydrate [20g/d CrM + 5g Carbohydrate (CHO) × 7 days, then 5g/d CrM +5g CHO × 77 days] or carbohydrate placebo (20g/d CHO × 7 days, then 5g/d CHO × 77 days) while participating in a high intensity resistance training program (3 sets × 10 repetitions at 75% of 1RM), 3 days per week for 12 weeks. Testing sessions were completed prior to, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post resistance training and supplementation. Each testing session included body composition measurement as determined by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), muscle strength measurement as determined by 1 repetition maximum (RM) on leg press and bench press. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A significant time effect was observed for 1RM bench press (0 weeks: 66.02kg ± 16.41kg vs. 12 weeks: 73.29kg ± 17.19 kg, p=0.016), leg press (0 weeks: 272.72kg ± 70.51kg vs. 12 weeks: 338.06kg ± 78.27kg, p<0.05), body mass (0 weeks: 91.31kg ± 13.91kg vs. 12 weeks: 92.49kg ± 13.68kg, p=0.030), and fat free mass (0 weeks: 57.75kg ± 9.19kg vs. 12 weeks: 59.00 kg ± 9.18 kg, p<0.005). However, no significant group or group by time interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation when combined with 12-weeks of high intensity resistance training does not enhance body composition and muscle strength in older males. Supplement was donated by Alzchem LLC-A Degussa Company.
Bench press
Leg press
Creatine
Creatine Monohydrate
One-repetition maximum
Repeated measures design
Cite
Citations (0)
The purpose of this study was to examine 10 weeks of creatine monohydrate (Cr) supplementation coupled with resistance training on body composition and strength in women trainees. Twenty-six subjects ingested Cr (n = 13) or a placebo (Pl) (n = 13) at a dose of 0.3 g·kg−1 and 0.03 g·kg−1 body mass for the initial 7 days and subsequent 9 weeks, respectively, while performing a resistance training program 4 days per week. Significant increases (p < 0.05) occurred in both groups for lean body mass and 1 repetition maximum (1RM) bench press and incline leg press. There was a significant main effect for training, but there was no significant difference in the total number of repetitions completed after 5 sets of multiple repetitions to exhaustion at 70% of 1RM for bench press and incline leg press for both groups or in the ability to perform a greater training volume (sets × repetitions × load) in the Cr vs. Pl groups over the 10 weeks. The results indicate that Cr supplementation combined with 10 weeks of concurrent resistance training may not improve strength or lean body mass greater than training only. These findings may be a result of nonresponders due to gender differences or a varying biological potential to uptake Cr within the muscle.
Bench press
Creatine Monohydrate
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Creatine
Strength Training
Cite
Citations (7)
Increased protein intake in the diet decreases fat mass (FM) and increases lean mass (LM). Resistance training increases LM, as well as increases muscular strength. Together, protein supplementation and resistance exercise work synergistically when taken prior to or following exercise. PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate the effects 8 weeks of protein supplementation and Autoregulatory Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE) training had on measures of body composition and muscular performance. METHODS: Untrained males (n = 22; 42.1 ± 7.1 years) participated in this pilot study. LM and FM were measured via Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), while strength was measured utilizing one repetition maximum (1RM), and endurance measured using maximum repetitions completed (REPS) at 75% 1RM for the bench and leg press. Subjects were randomly placed into one of four groups: control (CON), protein (PO), APRE, or protein plus APRE (PAPRE). Subjects repeated testing for the DEXA, 1RM, and REPS every four weeks for 8 weeks. Both PO and PAPRE groups ingested 25g of supplemental protein twice daily. Subjects in the exercise groups completed a resistance training program, 3 days per week, for 8 weeks, or 24 training sessions. RESULTS: Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant group by time interaction for LM, bench press 1RM, and leg press 1RM (p < .05). LM increased by 4% (+2.3 ± 0.2kg) in the PAPRE group, while increases in bench and leg press 1RM were 23% (+14.7 ± 0.7kg) and 50% (+132.1 ± 13.9 kg), respectively. There were no other group by time interactions for any of the variables assessed (p > .05). LM (p < .05), bench press 1RM (p < .001), and leg press 1RM (p < .001) indicated a significant time effect (+0.93 ± 0.02kg, +6.3 ± 0.9kg, and +68.2 ± 2.5kg, respectively). Body fat percentage showed a trend for decreasing over time (p = .05), while FM was significantly reduced over the 8-week training period (p < .05). Bench press increased 20% (+13.0 ± 2.0kg) from baseline for the APRE group, while leg press increased 13% (+32.9 ± 7.3kg), 18% (+43.1 ± 8.5kg), and 20% (+64.6 ± 28.8kg) for CON, PO, and APRE groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: The synergistic effects of protein plus exercise can be seen with the PAPRE group out-performing all other groups given the significant increases in LM and muscular strength over 8 weeks.
Bench press
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Repeated measures design
Dual energy
Cite
Citations (0)
PURPOSE: To examine the effects of ingesting free leucine on training-induced changes in body composition and muscle strength in older males. METHODS: Twenty three non-resistance trained males (61.22 ± 7.13 yrs, 176.93 ± 5.99 cm, 92.59 ± 14.59 kg) were randomized in a double blind manner. Participants ingested either leucine (LEU) [3g/d LEU + 5g carbohydrate (CHO)] or maltodextrose (CHO) (5g/d CHO) while participating in a supervised high intensity resistance training program (3 sets × 10 repetitions at 75% of 1RM), 3 days per week for 12 weeks. Testing sessions were completed prior to, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post resistance training and supplementation. Each testing session included muscle strength measurement as determined by 1 repetition maximum (RM) on leg press and bench press. Data was analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: A significant time effect was observed for 1RM bench press (0 weeks: 61.7 ± 17.2 kg vs. 12 weeks: 82.7 ± 23.1 kg, p < 0.001), 1 RM leg press (0 weeks: 261.6 ± 81.4 kg vs. 12 weeks: 392.4 ± 129.9 kg, p < 0.001), body weight (0 weeks: 92.59 ± 14.59 kg vs. 12 weeks: 93.56 ± 14.92 kg, p < 0.05) and fat free mass (0 weeks: 58.41 ± 9.13 kg vs. 12 weeks: 59.69 ± 8.98 kg, p< 0.01). A significant group by time interaction was observed for both 1RM bench press and leg press (p < 0.001), with subsequent analysis revealing significantly higher 1RM leg press strength in the LEU group compared to the CHO placebo at 12 weeks (LEU: 464.1 ± 145.7 kg vs. CHO = 333.7 ± 81.7 kg, p<0.05), while only a trend for higher 1RM bench press strength was identified in the LEU group compared to the CHO placebo at 12 weeks (LEU: 92.9 ± 22.6 kg vs. CHO: 74.4 ± 20.9 kg, p = 0.063). CONCLUSION: The ingestion of free leucine with carbohydrate, as compared to carbohydrate alone, when combined with 12-weeks of high intensity resistance training may enhance muscle strength in older males.
Bench press
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Strength Training
Repeated measures design
Cite
Citations (0)
Bench press
Creatine
Creatine Monohydrate
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Strength Training
Cite
Citations (113)
Movement velocity has been proposed as an effective tool to prescribe the load during resistance training in young healthy adults. This study aimed to elucidate whether movement velocity could also be used to estimate the relative load (i.e., % of the one-repetition maximum (1RM)) in older women.A total of 22 older women (age = 68.2 ± 3.6 years, bench press 1RM = 22.3 ± 4.7 kg, leg press 1RM = 114.6 ± 15.9 kg) performed an incremental loading test during the free-weight bench press and the leg press exercises on two separate sessions. The mean velocity (MV) was collected with a linear position transducer.A strong linear relationship between MV and the relative load was observed for the bench press (%1RM = -130.4 MV + 119.3; r2 = 0.827, standard error of the estimate (SEE) = 6.10%1RM, p < 0.001) and leg press exercises (%1RM = -158.3 MV + 131.4; r2 = 0.913, SEE = 5.63%1RM, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the bench press and leg press exercises for the MV attained against light-medium relative loads (≤70%1RM), while the MV associated with heavy loads (≥80%1RM) was significantly higher for the leg press.These results suggest that the monitoring of MV could be useful to prescribe the loads during resistance training in older women. However, it should be noted that the MV associated with a given %1RM is significantly lower in older women compared to young healthy individuals.
Bench press
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Cite
Citations (35)
Multiple studies corroborate the ergogenic properties of caffeine (CAF) for endurance performance, yet fewer investigations document the efficacy of acute CAF intake in short-term, anaerobic exercise. PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine the ergogenic potential of CAF during maximal strength testing. METHODS: Twenty experienced resistance-trained men ingested CAF (6 mg/kg) or placebo (PL) 1 h pre-exercise in a randomized, double-blind design. They refrained from CAF intake and strenuous exercise 48 and 24 h pre-visit. Initially, resting heart rate and blood pressure were obtained. After a standardized warm-up, one-repetition maximum (1 -RM) testing on the barbell bench press (BP) and leg press (LP) ensued. Upon determination of 1-RM, a load equivalent to 60 % 1-RM was placed on the bar, and the subject completed repetitions to failure. Heart rate, blood pressure, and rating of perceived exertion were measured after the final repetition. RESULTS: A paired t-test showed no difference (P>0.05) in 1-RM bench press (260.7 ± 51.9 lb vs. 258.0 ± 49.3 lb) or leg press (916.3 ± 206.4 lb vs. 889.5 ± 205.0 lb) with CAF versus PL. During bench press exercise, number of repetitions to fatigue and lifting volume were significantly higher (p<0.05) with CAF versus PL, yet no differences (P>0.05) were evident in leg press. No difference was demonstrated in rating of perceived exertion (p>0.05) at the end of resistance exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that CAF has little ergogenic benefit for 1-RM testing, yet may enhance performance during intense bench press exercise to fatigue.
Bench press
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Perceived exertion
Cite
Citations (1)
Background Dietary supplements containing L-arginine are marketed to improve exercise performance, but the efficacy of such supplements is not clear. Therefore, this study examined the efficacy of acute ingestion of L-arginine alpha-ketoglutarate (AAKG) muscular strength and endurance in resistance trained and untrained men.Methods Eight resistance trained and eight untrained healthy males ingested either 3000mg of AAKG or a placebo 45 minutes prior to a resistance exercise protocol in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. One-repetition maximum (1RM) on the standard barbell bench press and leg press were obtained. Upon determination of 1RM, subjects completed repetitions to failure at 60% 1RM on both the standard barbell bench press and leg press. Heart rate was measured pre and post exercise. One week later, subjects ingested the other supplement and performed the identical resistance exercise protocol.Results Our data showed statistical significant differences (p<0.05) between resistance trained and untrained males for both 1RM and total load volume (TLV; multiply 60% of 1RM times the number of repetitions to failure) for the upper body. However, 1RM and TLV were not statistically different (p>0.05) between supplementation conditions for either resistance trained or untrained men in the bench press or leg press exercises. Heart rate was similar at the end of the upper and lower body bouts of resistance exercise with AAKG vs. placebo.Conclusion The results from our study indicate that acute AAKG supplementation provides no ergogenic benefit on 1RM or TLV as measured by the standard barbell bench press and leg press, regardless of the subjects training status.
Bench press
Leg press
One-repetition maximum
Crossover study
Sports medicine
Cite
Citations (34)
Ormsbee, MJ, Carzoli, JP, Klemp, A, Allman, BR, Zourdos, MC, Kim, J-S, and Panton, LB. Efficacy of the repetitions in reserve-based rating of perceived exertion for the bench press in experienced and novice benchers. J Strength Cond Res 33(2): 337-345, 2019-Autoregulation (AR) is the practice of adjusting training variables in response to athlete feedback. One component of AR postulated to enhance resistance training adaptations involves implementing a resistance training-specific rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale measuring repetitions in reserve (RIR). The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of this method using the bench press exercise. Twenty-seven college-aged men were assigned to one of 2 groups based on training age: experienced benchers (EB) (n = 14, training age: 4.7 ± 2.0 years) and novice benchers (NB) (n = 13, training age: 1.1 ± 0.6 years). Subjects performed 1 repetition maximum (1RM) followed by single-repetition sets with loads corresponding to 60, 75, and 90% of 1RM and an 8-repetition set at 70% of 1RM. Subjects reported a corresponding RPE, based on RIR, for every set. Average velocity was recorded for each single-repetition set along with the first and last repetitions of the 8-repetition set at 70% of 1RM. Average velocity at 100% of 1RM in EB was slower (0.14 ± 0.04 m·s) compared with NB (0.20 ± 0.05 m·s) (p < 0.001). Experienced benchers recorded greater RPE than NB at 1RM (EB: 9.86 ± 0.14 vs. NB: 9.35 ± 0.36) (p = 0.011). No between-group differences existed for average velocity or RPE at any other intensity. Both EB (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) and NB (r = 0.85, p < 0.001) had strong inverse significant correlations between average velocity and RPE at all intensities. Our findings suggest that the RIR-based RPE scale may be an efficacious approach for AR of bench press training load and volume in college-aged men.
Bench press
One-repetition maximum
Perceived exertion
Repetition (rhetorical device)
Leg press
Cite
Citations (57)