[Application of serology and 14C-urea breath test to monitoring of the effect of anti-Helicobacter pylori chemotheraphy].
1
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
In order to evaluate the value of serology and 14C-urea breath test in monitoring the effect of anti-Helicobacter pylori chemotherapy, at the first stage of this study, endoscopy, 14C-urea breath test and serology (H. pylori IgG antibody measured by ELISA) were performed in 42 of patients before the onset of anti-H pylori chemotherapy and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after termination of the treatment. On analyzing the change of the results of breath test and serology during the one year follow-up period in these patients, "above the cutoff value" in breath test and "reduction of A value less than 15% when comparing with pretreatment" in serology were made as the H. pylori positive criteria for monitoring therapeutic effectiveness on H. pylori. At the second stage of this study, total of another 63 of patients were studied to test the accuracy of the monitoring criteria. The results showed that the sensitivity of breath test was all 100.0% and specificity 95.5% and 100.0% respectively at 6 and 12 month after termination of treatment, the sensitivity of serology was all 100.0% and specificity was 50.0% and 83.3% respectively. A scheme for monitoring the effect of anti-H. pylori chemotherapy by combination of 14C-urea breath test and serology is proposed based on this study.Keywords:
Urea breath test
Cite
Summary Background 13 Carbon urea breath testing is reliable to detect current infection with Helicobacter pylori but has been reported to be of limited value in selected patients with atrophic body gastritis or acid‐lowering medication. Aim To evaluate the accuracy of 13 carbon urea breath testing for H. pylori detection in 20 asymptomatic patients with histologically confirmed atrophic body gastritis in a primary care setting. Methods 13 Carbon urea breath testing and serology were compared with H. pylori culture of a corpus biopsy as reference test. Results All tests were in agreement in 12 patients, being all positive in six and all negative in six. One patient was positive for serology and culture but negative for 13 carbon urea breath testing, five patients had only positive serology and two patients had only positive 13 carbon urea breath testing. 13 Carbon urea breath testing showed an accuracy with culture of 85% and anti‐ H. pylori serology with culture of 75%. 13 Carbon urea breath testing carried out in patients with positive serology showed an accuracy of 92%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of 13 carbon urea breath testing shows optimal discrimination at the prescribed cut‐off value. Conclusions 13 Carbon urea breath testing can be used as diagnostic H. pylori test in asymptomatic patients with atrophic body gastritis, preferably in addition to serology, to select subjects for anti‐ H. pylori therapy.
Urea breath test
Atrophic gastritis
Cite
Citations (15)
Urea breath test
Spirillaceae
Organic disease
Cite
Citations (18)
Peptic
Helicobacter Infections
Cite
Citations (99)
Background. The 13 C urea breath test (UBT) is considered to be the most accurate way of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection. Our objective was to investigate the accuracy of the UBT in Japanese patients and the association of UBT values with histological findings. Materials and Methods. A total of 169 consecutive patients were studied by endoscopy with histology, by serology with IgG antibody and test serum pepsinogen (PG), and by UBT. The association between UBT values and histological findings and the PG I / II ratio were analyzed in H. pylori –positive patients. Results. Of 169 Japanese patients, 135 were H. pylori –positive on both histology and serology analysis, 27 were H. pylori –negative on both histology and serology analysis, and 7 patients showed differing results. Using a cutoff value of 2.5‰, test sensitivity was 100%, while specificity was 96%. Among the 135 H. pylori –positive patients, a significant relation was observed between UBT value and H. pylori colonization density of the corpus and antrum, neutrophil activity of the antrum, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia of the corpus in the H. pylori –positive patients. Also, UBT values correlated with the PG I /II ratio. In multivariate analysis, the PG I /II ratio was the most important factor related to UBT values (odds ration [OR], 4.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.60–15.55). Conclusions. The UBT is an accurate method for detecting H. pylori infection in the Japanese population, which shows a high prevalence of atrophic gastritis. Values are affected by H. pylori infection and by the severity of atrophic gastritis.
Atrophic gastritis
Intestinal metaplasia
Urea breath test
Histology
Rapid urease test
Cite
Citations (47)
Rapid urease test
Gold standard (test)
Urea breath test
Peptic
Cite
Citations (12)
To establish the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serology (IgG ELISA) as an alternative diagnostic method for Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer and digestive hemorrhage. The diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in these patients is difficult due to the low sensitivity of invasive tests and the need to discontinue treatment with proton pump inhibitors to perform a breath test with urea 13C or the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigens in feces.We included 214 patients (164 men and 50 women) with an average age of 58 +/- 15 years, who were admitted to hospital due to upper gastro-intestinal bleeding caused by a gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer. The presence of Helicobacter pylori was established by means of gastric biopsy (fast urease test histology and/or culture) and a breath test with 13C-labeled urea. Serology was performed with the ELISA method (Pyloriset EIA-G by Orion Diagnostica). Positive Helicobacter pylori infection was accepted with any positive invasive method or breath test, and no infection was established if all invasive tests performed and the breath test with 13C-labeled urea were negative. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of serology in the global series and in different subgroups of patients according to age (> 60 and < 40 years), recent exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, type of endoscopic wound and history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer.192 patients (89.7%) showed infection due to Helicobacter pylori. In the global series (n = 214) we obtained a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 87.5, 54.5, 94.3 and 33.3%, respectively. Specificity was greater in the group not exposed to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (n = 110) as compared to the exposed group (n = 104), in the < 40 year old group (n = 28) with respect to the > 60 years group (n = 105), in the duodenal ulcer group (n = 141) with respect to the gastric ulcer group (n = 59), and in the group with a history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcers (n = 92) as compared to the group without any of these past events (n = 122); nevertheless, no significant statistics were reached.IgG (ELISA) serology shows low specificity and a low negative predictive value in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with gastro-intestinal bleeding due to gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer. The diagnostic value of serology did not improve significantly when age, recent exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, type of endoscopic wound or history of gastro-duodenal peptic ulcer was taken into consideration. We may consider that serology is not a good diagnostic method for the detection of Helicobacter pylori in patients with digestive hemorrhage caused by gastro-duodenal ulcer.
Rapid urease test
Urea breath test
Gastro-
Peptic
Cite
Citations (10)
OBJECTIVES: There is an increasing interest in noninvasive tests for detecting Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. Unlike serological and urea breath tests, the possibility of searching for H. pylori in feces has been scarcely investigated. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate the usefulness of a new enzyme immunoassay for detecting H. pylori antigens in feces, as a predictor of H. pylori status in the pre- and posttreatment settings. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-four symptomatic, anti-H. pylori untreated patients (Group A) and 116 anti-H. pylori treated patients (Group B) underwent gastroscopy with biopsies of the antrum and corpus for histology (H) and rapid urease test (RUT). In the anti-H. pylori treated group, a 13C-urea breath test (UBT) was also performed. In Group A, H. pylori status was defined as positive or negative when both H and RUT gave concordant positive or negative results. In Group B, the patients were considered eradicated if all three tests were negative. A stool specimen was collected from all patients the day after gastroscopy, and tested by using an enzyme immunoassay commercial kit for detecting H. pylori antigens in feces (HpSAT). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients in Group A (55%) and 44 in Group B (38%) were H. pylori infected. On the whole, HpSAT showed a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 86%. In Group A and Group B, sensitivity and specificity were 94%versus 93%, and 90%versus 82%, respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HpSAT seems to be a reliable method for predicting H. pylori status in anti-H. pylori untreated patients. Conversely, the test appears less suitable to evaluate the outcome of the eradicating treatment. Consequently, it is likely to be accepted for the primary diagnosis of H. pylori status, particularly in dyspeptic young patients.
Rapid urease test
Urea breath test
Spirillaceae
Group B
Cite
Citations (29)
Background: This is a report of the results of a multicenter study performed in children with dyspepsia from five pediatric centers in Puglia, a region in southern Italy. In the study, clinical features of Helicobacter pylori infection, the reliability of diagnostic techniques, and the involvement of bacterial strains were examined. Methods: Fifty-three outpatients with dyspepsia enrolled in our study and compiled a diary recording clinical symptoms in patients before they underwent the following diagnostic techniques: endoscopy, biopsy for histologic analysis, rapid urease test, 13C urea breath test, serology specific for immunoglobulin (Ig) G and anti-CagA and VacA. Results: H. pylori showed a prevalence of 30.2% (n = 16). Histologic positivity was seen in all patients at the antral level (H. pylori-associated chronic gastritis). In the gastric body, bacterial chronic active gastritis was present only in six patients (H. pylori-associated chronic pangastritis). Clinical evaluation showed a significant difference in favor of subjects positive for H. pylori only for epigastric burning and/or pain (p < 0.001). The comparison of results of diagnostic tests, using histology as the gold standard, showed sensitivity and specificity of more than 93% for 13C urea breath test and more than 85% for rapid urease test and serology. Anti-CagA antibodies were found in 64.3% and anti-VacA antibodies in 42.8% of H. pylori-positive patients. Conclusions: H. pylori prevalence in children with dyspepsia from the geographic area studied in comparable with that found in other developed countries. Approximately 50% of the studied patients were infected by cytotoxic strains. The urea breath test was the most reliable noninvasive diagnostic tool and is suitable for routine use, although endoscopy with histologic assessment remains the definitive investigation and is particularly important in patients with positive serology for CagA and VacA. Finally, the frequency of aggressive strains in our region seems to affect the clinical pattern; this emphasizes the importance of definitive diagnosis in children and offers a new role for serology.
Rapid urease test
Spirillaceae
Urea breath test
CagA
Gold standard (test)
Epigastric pain
Chronic gastritis
Cite
Citations (32)
In peptic ulcer bleeding, the sensitivity of H. pylori tests, in particular of the rapid urease test (RUT), has been reported to be insufficient.To validate the RUT, serology and the urea breath test were carried out in patients with bleeding peptic ulcers, and to study the influence of H. pylori suppressive treatment (HpSuT), i. e., antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors.123 consecutive patients (mean age 65.5 years) with a relevant bleeding from gastric or duodenal ulcers were prospectively tested for H. pylori infection by directs tests (RUT, histology, culture, urea breath test) and by IgG serology as an indirect test. Positive H. pylori status was defined by positive histology or culture.In patients without HpSuT during the preceding four weeks (N = 83), the sensitivity and specificity of RUT was 94 and 84 %, that of serology 83 and 68 % respectively. The sensitivity of urea breath test decreased from 82 to 60 % after even one day of HpSuT. In the overall group, the duration of HpSuT and preceding hospitalization were independent factors linked with negative results of all direct tests.In peptic ulcer bleeding, RUT combined with histology is an adequate diagnostic approach. However, false negative results have to be considered following even short-term HpSuT or hospitalization. Non-invasive diagnosis based on serology alone is inaccurate and should be complemented by the urea breath test prior to starting HpSuT.
Urea breath test
Rapid urease test
Peptic
Histology
Cite
Citations (25)
Rapid urease test
Spirillaceae
Urea breath test
Histology
Cite
Citations (15)