Effect of Donor Surgeon on Flrst Cadaver Kidney” Transplant Function
5
Citation
9
Reference
10
Related Paper
Abstract:
No AccessJournal of Urology1 Feb 1982Effect of Donor Surgeon on Flrst Cadaver Kidney” Transplant Function John M. Barry, Susan M. Fischer, Dawn H. Craig, Eugene F. Fuchs, and Mary Ann Farnsworth John M. BarryJohn M. Barry More articles by this author , Susan M. FischerSusan M. Fischer More articles by this author , Dawn H. CraigDawn H. Craig More articles by this author , Eugene F. FuchsEugene F. Fuchs More articles by this author , and Mary Ann FarnsworthMary Ann Farnsworth More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53711-8AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Community urologists and general surgeons were recruited into a cadaver kidney program in 1976. This study from 1 center compares 41 primary cadaver kidney grafts retrieved by community hospital retrieval teams to 60 primary cadaver kidney grafts retrieved by a center-based transplant team. Of the kidneys 100 were preserved with Collins’ C2 flushing followed by simple cold storage and 1 was preserved with pulsatile machine perfusion. Cold storage time ranged from 9 to 44.5 hours in the community hospital kidney group and from 11 to 44 hours in the university hospital group. There was no significant difference between the 2 kidney retrieval teams with respect to 1) incidence of acute tubular necrosis, 2) 1-month serum creatinine nadir of surviving grafts, 3) 1 and 2-year serum creatinine levels and 4) actuarial graft survivals up to 5 years. Community hospital retrieval teams can provide kidneys as satisfactory for transplantation as a center-based transplant team and are a valuable resource for cadaver kidney transplant programs. © 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBarry J, Hefty T, Nelson K and Johnston T (2018) Ten Years of Training Community Urologists and General Surgeons to Do Cadaver Kidney RetrievalsJournal of Urology, VOL. 143, NO. 5, (897-899), Online publication date: 1-May-1990.Novick A (2018) Editorial CommentsJournal of Urology, VOL. 129, NO. 6, (1113-1113), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1983. Volume 127Issue 2February 1982Page: 227-229 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1982 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information John M. Barry More articles by this author Susan M. Fischer More articles by this author Dawn H. Craig More articles by this author Eugene F. Fuchs More articles by this author Mary Ann Farnsworth More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...Keywords:
Memphis
Memphis
Cite
Citations (6)
Cite
Citations (0)
Memphis
Cite
Citations (81)
Memphis
Cite
Citations (8)
Journal Article Elevated Cytokine Levels in a Patient with AIDS and Hypercalcemia: Effects of Therapy with Pamidronate Get access Laura D. Carbone, Laura D. Carbone Baptist Memorial Hospital and The University of Tennessee at Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Mack A. Land, Mack A. Land Baptist Memorial Hospital and The University of Tennessee at Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Frankie B. Stentz, Frankie B. Stentz Baptist Memorial Hospital and The University of Tennessee at Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Genaro M. A. Palmieri Genaro M. A. Palmieri Baptist Memorial Hospital and The University of Tennessee at Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee Reprints or correspondence: Dr. Genaro M. A. Palmieri, The University of Tennessee at Memphis, 956 Court Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38163. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic PubMed Google Scholar Clinical Infectious Diseases, Volume 21, Issue 3, September 1995, Page 699, https://doi.org/10.1093/clinids/21.3.699 Published: 01 September 1995
Memphis
Cite
Citations (7)
Racial disparities in kidney transplantation continue to persist despite voluminous studies attempting to address this problem. We conducted 26 semi-structured, one-on-one interviews with African-American and Caucasian dialysis patients to analyze whether or not there is a difference in attitudes toward kidney transplantation and whether or not this contributes to these disparities. Pre-dialysis education strongly correlates with a person’s willingness to get listed, while fear of surgery and care of the transplanted kidney, and interaction with peers who have gone through a failed kidney transplant, decrease the chances of getting listed. Subjects did not report racial bias in being referred or worked up for transplant. African Americans were more likely to weigh the pros and cons of transplants while Caucasians were more likely to see dialysis as temporary and viewed transplant as the default treatment for their kidney failure. All dialysis patients, but especially African Americans, may benefit from transplant education tailored to address specific patient concerns.
Cite
Citations (5)
Background/Aims: Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best treatment for end-stage renal disease patients.Although previous studies have demonstrated that the clinical outcome following living related (LR) KT is better than that following unrelated (LUR) KT in ABO-compatible KT recipients, recent studies showed no differences in clinical outcomes between the two treatments.In this study, we compared the clinical outcomes of LR and LUR KT in ABO-incompatible KT recipients.Methods: From January 2011 to August 2013, 19 cases of ABO-incompatible KT were analyzed retrospectively.Eight kidneys (7 cases of parent-offspring and 1 case of siblings, Group 1) were donated from living-related donors and 11 (all spousal donors, Group 2) from living-unrelated donors.We investigated patient survival, graft survival, acute rejection, graft function, and complications.Results: On Kaplan-Meier analysis, patient and graft survival during follow-up were 87.5% and 87.5% in Group 1; both were 100% in Group 2. Acute rejection, graft function, and medical and surgical complications were not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusions: The short-term clinical outcomes between LR and LUR KT in ABO-incompatible KT recipients were equivalent.Most domestic cases of LUR KT are from spousal donors and the spousal donor will be a major donor in ABO-incompatible KT patients.(
ABO incompatibility
Cite
Citations (1)
This chapter focuses on Memphis, a metropolis of ancient Egypt, and the possibility that it was the site of the remains of monumental temples, royal residences, palaces, and many other urban features. Meni, the legendary unifier of Egypt and founder of the First Dynasty at the turn of the fourth to third millennium BC, is credited with the founding of Memphis. It is believed that, in addition to the stronghold, Meni also founded the Temple of Ptah, the chief god of the new royal seat. The chapter traces the history of Memphis and describes the district of the Temple of Ptah, along with the pyramids, royal tombs, and other structures located in the city. It also considers some of the deities who had their cult in Memphis, including Hathor. Finally, it looks at the pharaohs who built their tombs in Memphis.
Memphis
Cult
Cite
Citations (0)
Research Article| September 01, 2014 Update of Urban Seismic‐Hazard Maps for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee: Geology and VS Observations Chris H. Cramer; Chris H. Cramer aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A.cramer@ceri.memphis.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Roy B. Van Arsdale; Roy B. Van Arsdale bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mahesh S. Dhar; Mahesh S. Dhar aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A.cramer@ceri.memphis.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Daniel Pryne; Daniel Pryne bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Justin Paul Justin Paul bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Chris H. Cramer aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A.cramer@ceri.memphis.edu Roy B. Van Arsdale bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Mahesh S. Dhar aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A.cramer@ceri.memphis.edu Daniel Pryne bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Justin Paul bDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of Memphis, Johnson Hall, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A. Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Online ISSN: 1938-2057 Print ISSN: 0895-0695 © 2014 by the Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2014) 85 (5): 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140011 Article history First Online: 14 Jul 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Chris H. Cramer, Roy B. Van Arsdale, Mahesh S. Dhar, Daniel Pryne, Justin Paul; Update of Urban Seismic‐Hazard Maps for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee: Geology and VS Observations. Seismological Research Letters 2014;; 85 (5): 986–996. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220140011 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search In 2004, Memphis urban seismic‐hazard maps were completed for a six‐quadrangle area centered on Memphis and southern Shelby County (Cramer et al., 2004, 2006, 2008). Both probabilistic and scenario seismic and liquefaction hazard maps were generated for the six‐quadrangle study area. These urban seismic‐hazard maps, particularly the liquefaction hazard maps, have been used by consultants and public agencies to address seismic‐hazard mitigation in the Memphis area. Memphis has the second highest annualized expected loss (AEL, expected losses to building inventory times frequency of occurrence) and the highest seismic hazard and AEL ratio (normalized by the... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Memphis
Cite
Citations (16)
Research Article| January 03, 2018 Update of the Urban Seismic and Liquefaction Hazard Maps for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee: Liquefaction Probability Curves and 2015 Hazard Maps Chris H. Cramer; Chris H. Cramer aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A., ccramer@memphis.edumsdhar@memphis.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Mahesh S. Dhar; Mahesh S. Dhar aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A., ccramer@memphis.edumsdhar@memphis.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Arellano David Arellano bDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Memphis, 104 Engineering Science Building, Memphis, Tennessee 38153‐3050 U.S.A., darellan@memphis.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Chris H. Cramer aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A., ccramer@memphis.edumsdhar@memphis.edu Mahesh S. Dhar aCenter for Earthquake Research and Information, University of Memphis, 3890 Central Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38152‐3050 U.S.A., ccramer@memphis.edumsdhar@memphis.edu David Arellano bDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Memphis, 104 Engineering Science Building, Memphis, Tennessee 38153‐3050 U.S.A., darellan@memphis.edu Publisher: Seismological Society of America First Online: 03 Jan 2018 Online Issn: 1938-2057 Print Issn: 0895-0695 © Seismological Society of America Seismological Research Letters (2018) 89 (2A): 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170139 Article history First Online: 03 Jan 2018 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Chris H. Cramer, Mahesh S. Dhar, David Arellano; Update of the Urban Seismic and Liquefaction Hazard Maps for Memphis and Shelby County, Tennessee: Liquefaction Probability Curves and 2015 Hazard Maps. Seismological Research Letters 2018;; 89 (2A): 688–701. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220170139 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietySeismological Research Letters Search Advanced Search ABSTRACT In 2012–2013, Memphis urban seismic hazard maps were updated and expanded to all of Shelby County, Tennessee, from the original six 7.5′ quadrangles in 2004. The 2013 revised Memphis urban seismic hazard maps used an updated 3D geologic model, which led to a significant increase in hazard. In 2014–2015, we revised the geotechnical aspects of the 2004 hazard maps and adopted the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) National Seismic Hazard Mapping Project (NSHMP) 2014 hazard model. We generated revised probabilistic and scenario ground motion and liquefaction urban hazard maps for 12+ quadrangles covering Shelby Co. The resulting 2015 probabilistic Memphis urban hazard maps showed similar seismic hazard (within 10%) to the 2013 maps, but reduced seismic hazard for the scenario maps compared to the 2013 maps, due to decreased ground‐motion predictions by the 2014 NSHMP attenuation model. By including details about local geological, geotechnical, and geophysical conditions, the new seismic hazard maps tend to show lower peak ground acceleration (PGA) hazard compared to the B/C boundary 2014 USGS NSHMP, whereas the 1.0 s hazard is higher compared to the USGS 2014 maps. The 2004 liquefaction probability curves were revised using additional geotechnical boring information and updated water table information. Liquefaction hazard changes are mainly in the predictions for loess and alluvium, which show reductions and increases, respectively, from the 2004 equivalent hazard maps, due to improved modeling of liquefaction response from our 2014–2015 study. A public and professional outreach workshop was held 28 July 2015 to raise public, business, and professional awareness of Memphis area earthquake hazards and to disseminate the revised urban hazard maps produced in 2015. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Memphis
Cite
Citations (10)