Competencia Docente en Educación Física de secundaria Spanish version of the Evaluation of Teaching Competencies Scale in Physical Education of secondary school Validação em espanhol da Evaluation of Teaching Competencies Scale em Educação Física no ensino secundário
0
Citation
27
Reference
20
Related Paper
Abstract:
The aim of this research was to analyze the psychometric properties of Evaluation of Teaching Competencies Scale (ETCS) in a Spanish sample of Physical Education in secondary education. It was administered to a total of 758 high school students from 12 to 18 years, analyzing the structure of the instrument using confirmatory procedures. The analyzes support the hypoth - esized theoretical model of origin, the eight items presented adequate measures and scale homogeneity acceptable internal consistency (composite reliability =.93; average variance extracted =.61; Cronbach's alpha =.90) and temporal stability. The data were excellent model fit: χ 2 =27.68, df=20, p=.117, χCite
this study aims to design and validate a questionnaire to measure the students' perception of the use of IRS as a technopedagogical resource in the classroom.a 24 items questionnaire (Interactive Response System for the Improvement of the Teaching-Learning Process) was designed ad hoc for this research and applied to 142 university students.both the exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis yielded 3 dimensions: classroom environment, teaching-learning processes and learning assessment. The results obtained both in reliability (Cronbach's alpha= 0.955) and in the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (χ2/df=1.944, CFI=0.97; GFI=0.78; RMR=0.077; RMSEA=0.08) reveal highly satisfactory indices.statistical analyses confirm that this instrument is a valid, reliable, and easy-to-apply tool for professors to evaluate the student perception of student-centred learning.
Exploratory factor analysis
Cite
Citations (5)
The assessment of attitudes toward school with the objective of identifying adolescents who may be at risk of underachievement has become an important area of research in educational psychology, although few specific tools for their evaluation have been designed to date. One of the instruments available is the School Attitude Assessment Survey-Revised (SAAS-R).The objective of the current research is to test the construct validity and to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the SAAS-R. Data were collected from 1,398 students attending different high schools. Students completed the SAAS-R along with measures of the g factor, and academic achievement was obtained from school records.Confirmatory factor analysis, multivariate analysis of variance and analysis of variance tests supported the validity evidence.The results indicate that the Spanish version of the SAAS-R is a useful measure that contributes to identification of underachieving students. Lastly, the results obtained and their implications for education are discussed.
Cite
Citations (9)
El artículo presenta la validez y fiabilidad de un instrumento para evaluar el nivel de competencia digital del profesorado de Educación Infantil y de Educación Primaria para llevar a cabo la acción tutorial a través de recursos TIC como parte del proceso educativo en tiempos de COVID-19. El instrumento cuenta con 35 ítems clasificados en cinco dimensiones (A- funciones del tutor con el alumnado, B- funciones del tutor con el profesorado, C- funciones del tutor con la familia, D-Formación en TIC y transferencia, E- Uso de recursos TIC). El instrumento fue aplicado a una muestra de 1098 profesores en activo procedentes de 14 comunidades autónomas de España. La fiabilidad fue medida a través de Alfa de Cronbach, Coeficiente de Spearman-Brown, Dos mitades de Guttman, Omega McDonald y fiabilidad Compuesta. Para comprobar la validez del instrumento, fue analizado la validez de comprensión, exploración de la dimensionalidad mediante Análisis-Factorial-Exploratorio (AFE), y se fue ajustando el instrumento a través de diferentes modelos a través del análisis factorial confirmatorio (AFC). Además, fue analizada la invarianza factorial por la variable sexo (masculino-femenino), tipo de centro (público-concertado) y tipo de profesorado (educación infantil-educación primaria), así como la validez externa. Los análisis de fiabilidad fueron altamente satisfactorios y en relación a la validez de constructo, los resultados encontraron un buen ajuste del modelo tanto en la validez interna como en la invarianza factorial, con una versión final del instrumento de 25 ítems. This article demonstrates the validity and reliability of an instrument to evaluate the level of digital competence of Early Childhood Education and Primary Education teachers to carry out online tutorials using ICT resources as part of the educational process during the COVID-19 pandemic. The instrument consists of 35 items classified into five dimensions (A – functions of the tutor with the students; B – functions of the tutor with the teaching staff; C – functions of the tutor with the family; D – training in ICT and transfer; E – use of ICT resources). The instrument was applied to a sample of 1,098 active teachers from 14 autonomous communities located in Spain. Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s Alpha, the Spearman-Brown Coefficient, Guttman Two Halves, Omega McDonald, and for composite reliability. To check the validity of the instrument, we analysed the validity of understanding, and exploration of dimensionality using Factorial-Exploratory Analysis (EFA), and the instrument was adjusted for the different models through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). In addition, factorial invariance was evaluated based on the variables sex (male/female), type of centre (public/charter school), and type of teaching staff (Early Childhood Education/Primary Education), as well as external validity. The results of the reliability analyses were highly satisfactory and, in relation to the construct validity, the results found a good fit of the model, both in the internal validity and in the factorial invariance. The final version of the instrument consists of 25 items.
Factorial analysis
Cite
Citations (11)
Evaluar competencias no es una tarea fácil ya que éstas engloban: conocimiento, actitudes y destrezas. El acercamiento más real es quizá mediante una autoevaluación donde la persona que la conteste este consciente de su finalidad. Para la construcción de este artículo, se consideró la definición de Perrenoud, quien se refiere a la competencia como la capacidad de actuar eficazmente en una situación de un tipo definido, capacidad que se apoya en los conocimientos. El presente estudio tuvo la finalidad de diseñar y validar un instrumento confiable y pertinente que permita la autoevaluación de las competencias de los docentes del área de matemáticas, considerando el enfoque de la socioformación. Se realizó la validación de contenido con un grupo de 12 jueces expertos, aplicando la V de Aiken y el grado de relevancia con un pilotaje de 28 participantes, determinado por Alfa de Cronbach. Como resultado se llegó a niveles adecuados con mínimas observaciones y se concluyó con un instrumento confiable y pertinente. Evaluating competencies is not an easy task since they encompass knowledge, attitudes, and skills. The most realistic approach is through a self-assessment where the person who answers it is aware of its purpose. For the construction of this article, the definition of Perrenoud was considered, who refers to competence as the capacity to act effectively in a situation of a defined type, a capacity that is supported by knowledge. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a reliable and pertinent instrument that allows the self-assessment of mathematics teachers’ competencies, considering the socio-training approach. Content validation was carried out with a group of twelve expert judges, applying Aiken’s V and the degree of relevance with a pilot of twenty-eight participants, determined by Cronbach’s Alpha. As a result, adequate levels were reached with minimal observations and a reliable and relevant instrument was concluded.
Cite
Citations (0)
Given the importance of reflecting upon teaching praxis, assessment of teacher performance remains one of the tools used to ensure the quality of education. The aim of this study was to identify the psychometric properties of the instrument given to students from a university in Sonora to gather opinions on the core competencies of professors teaching at undergraduate level, thus contributing to decision-making in the professor assessment process. From the 30,224 questionnaires answered, a factor analysis was performed (for construct validity) using the principal component method, extracting two factors that explain the 73.1% total variance. Three items were noted for their lack of clarity. An alpha of 0.97 was calculated (internal consistency).
CLARITY
Cite
Citations (0)
Abstract Background There are major changes in education strategies as higher education institutions urgently need to adopt distance education tools and practices due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Medical education is also trying to get out of this emergency using distance education. In this study, we aimed to develop a reliable and valid scale in order to evaluate the perceptions of medical students towards distance education. Methods The students taking part in the study were in the first five academic years of the medical faculty in Bursa in Turkey. At first, 57 items were determined to evaluate students’ perceptions. Content validity was examined according to the assessment of the expert team. Construct validity of these items was examined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Also, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated for reliability analysis. The medical students’ responses were scored using a five-point Likert scale. Results When the content validity was examined, the number of items was determined to be 38 items. Construct validity of these items was examined by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Because of the exploratory factor analysis performed on the responses of 429 medical students, 22 items were included in four factors. This four-factor model was applied to 286 medical students and validated by confirmatory factor analysis. Also, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were calculated for reliability analysis and values were between 0.713 and 0.930. Conclusions This study demonstrated validation and reliability of perceptions of distance education for medical students. We suggest a 22-item model with a four-factorial scale.
Exploratory factor analysis
Content Validity
Item analysis
Validity
Face validity
Cite
Citations (13)
Background: Recent educational research has explored how university teachers approach their teaching. One of the most widely used instruments is Trigwell and Prosser´s (2004) Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI). There is, however, scarce research on the Spanish version of this questionnaire. This paper aimed: 1) to analyse the reliability and structural validity of two existing versions of ATI in Spanish language, and 2) to present a proposal for a new Spanish version of ATI, and to measure its reliability and validity. Method: The samples comprised university and trainee teachers from two Spanish universities. Results: Reliability coefficients, factor structures, and item loadings of the two existing Spanish versions of ATI were evaluated. Some coincidental outcomes suggested that a revised ATI in Spanish was required, thus a new version (S-ATI-20) was presented and tested on a new sample. Conclusions: The results suggest questionnaires should be suitably translated and item wording carefully adapted. Factor analyses moderately support a two-scale model, but a lack of correlation between approaches suggests alternative approaches to teaching models might be worth considering. This paper presents preliminary results which should be taken with caution, but S-ATI-20 may serve as a tool for self-reflection in faculty development.
Spanish language
Validity
Cite
Citations (34)
Two classes of each of four hundred high school teachers were rated for teaching effectiveness by the teachers and by their students using the same instrument. Separate factor analyses yielded highly similar underlying dimensions. Convergent validity coefficients were significant for all factors. These findings provide support for the validity of high school student ratings of instruction.
Convergent validity
Factor (programming language)
Cite
Citations (10)
Introducción: Aunque existen instrumentos en español para evaluar el desempeño docente durante el ciclo básico o la especialización médica, faltan instrumentos para evaluar la docencia en los años iniciales del entrenamiento clínico, en que el profesor cumple un rol fundamental facilitando el aprendizaje experiencial. MEDUC30 es un cuestionario en español desarrollado por la Escuela de Medicina de la Pontificia Universidad Católica para este efecto. Se construyó con base en el modelo educacional del Programa de Desarrollo Docente de la Universidad de Stanford (SFDP) y ha sido usado desde 2004 en la Pontificia Universidad Católica y validado previamente con métodos exploratorios.
Objetivo: Proveer evidencia de validez y confiabilidad de MEDUC30 que avale su utilidad en contextos hispanohablantes, usando métodos analíticos confirmatorios.
Método: Este es un estudio de carácter analítico, longitudinal y retrospectivo. Se analizaron 24,681 cuestionarios que evaluaban 579 docentes clínicos. Éstos fueron completados por estudiantes de medicina entre tercer y séptimo año, entre 2004 y 2015. Los datos se analizaron mediante análisis factorial exploratorio (AFE) y confirmatorio (AFC), y se evaluó la invariancia de medición con AFC multi-grupo.
Resultados: Se compararon cuatro modelos, de los cuales un modelo bi-factor fue el que mejor dio cuenta de los datos. Este modelo está compuesto de un factor general y seis específicos: [i] Enseñanza centrada en el paciente, [ii] Comunicación de objetivos, [iii] Evaluación y retroalimentación, [iv] Promoción de la comprensión, la retención y el aprendizaje auto-dirigido, [v] Control de la sesión, y [vi] Clima de aprendizaje. La confiabilidad general fue excelente (α Cronbach= .98, ω McDonald = .98) y la de los seis factores, muy buena (α Cronbach =.88-.95, ω McDonald = .78-.94). La invarianza de medición se sostuvo para sexo del docente, fecha, semestre, curso, campo clínico, y duración de la rotación. Todas estas variables mostraron ser fuentes de heterogeneidad poblacional.
Conclusiones: MEDUC30 es un instrumento en español válido y confiable para proveer retroalimentación a los docentes clínicos tanto de su efectividad docente general como de seis dominios educacionales específicos. Además, puede proporcionar información útil para jefes de programas y autoridades para mejorar la calidad de la docencia clínica.
Cite
Citations (0)
Psychometric properties of the in uences on planning decision-making in physical education questionnaire (CIPEF) Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario de las in uencias en la plani cación de la toma de decisiones en educación física (CIPEF)
Cite
Citations (2)