MYC Activation Is a Hallmark of Cancer Initiation and Maintenance
732
Citation
135
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Meital Gabay, Yulin Li and Dean W. Felsher Division of Oncology, Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 Correspondence: dfelsher{at}stanford.eduKeywords:
Senescence
Non-genotoxic chemical carcinogens are capable of inducing tumors in rodents without interacting with or directly altering the genetic material. Since a preponderance of evidence suggests that cancer results from the accumulation of genetic alterations, the mechanisms by which many non-genotoxic carcinogens induce genotoxic events remain unclear. The present study investigated whether the mitogenic, non-genotoxic carcinogen phenobarbital (PB) could alter cell-cycle checkpoint controls, thereby indirectly leading to the accumulation of genetic damage. Initial studies involved characterizing cell-cycle checkpoint responses to DNA damage in freshly isolated B6C3F1 mouse hepatocytes. These cells responded to bleomycin-induced DNA damage by arresting in G1 and G2. Cell-cycle arrest was coupled with p53 protein induction; however, p21WAF1 protein levels remained unchanged. Studies that utilized hepatocytes isolated from C57BL p53-/- mice showed that the DNA damage-induced G1 cell-cycle arrest was dependent on p53 function, but cell-cycle arrest in G2 was not affected by loss of p53. PB was able to delay and attenuate the G1 checkpoint response without altering G2 checkpoint function. A reduction in p53 protein, but not transcript levels, was observed in hepatocytes exposed to PB. Additionally, PB delayed and attenuated p53 protein induction during DNA damage, which suggests that changes in the p53 protein may be contributing to the attenuated G1 checkpoint response caused by PB. Altered G1 checkpoint function represents an epigenetic mechanism by which phenobarbital may prevent the detection and repair of DNA damage and indirectly increase the frequency of genotoxic events above that occurring spontaneously. Abrogation of checkpoint controls may, thus, play an important mechanistic role in mitogenic, non-genotoxic chemical carcinogenesis.
CHEK1
Checkpoint Kinase 2
Cite
Citations (21)
Critical telomere shortening induces senescence in many normal human cell types grown in culture. Recent data have revealed that dysfunctional telomeres can resemble certain forms of DNA damage, and point to a role for DNA damage signaling in the establishment and maintenance of telomere-initiated senescence. Here, we review these new observations and highlight potential avenues of future research. We consider the identities of the key DNA damage response factors involved in senescence and discuss a model for the molecular events occurring in pre-senescent cells that ultimately lead to a permanent cell cycle arrest phenotype.
Senescence
Shelterin
Cellular senescence
Cite
Citations (60)
The retinoblastoma (Rb) tumor suppressor gene product, pRb, has an established role in the implementation of cellular senescence, the state of irreversible G1 cell cycle arrest provoked by diverse oncogenic stresses. In murine cells, senescence cell cycle arrest can be reversed by subsequent inactivation of pRb, indicating that pRb is required not only for the onset of cellular senescence, but also for the maintenance of senescence program in murine cells. However, in human cells, once pRb is fully activated by p16INK4a, senescence cell cycle arrest becomes irreversible and is no longer revoked by subsequent inactivation of pRb, suggesting that p16INK4a/Rb-pathway activates an alternative mechanism to irreversibly block the cell cycle in human senescent cells. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanism underlying the irreversibility of senescence cell cycle arrest and its potential towards tumor suppression.
Senescence
Cellular senescence
Dual role
Cellular Aging
Cite
Citations (74)
Cellular senescence is a permanent cell cycle arrest and a potent tumor suppression mechanism. The p53 tumor suppressor is a sequence-specific transcription factor and acts as a central hub sensing various stress signals and activating an array of target genes to induce cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence. Recent reports showed that restoration of p53 induces premature senescence and tumor regression in mice with hepatocarcinomas or sarcomas. Thus, p53-mediated senescence is capable of eliminating cancer cells in vivo. p63 and p73, two homologues of p53, have similar function in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, the role of p63 and p73 in cellular senescence is elusive. In this review, we will discuss how p53 regulates senescence and future studies about p53 family members in senescence.
Senescence
Cellular senescence
Cite
Citations (88)
DNA damage is the major cause of senescence and apoptosis; however, the manner by which DNA-damaged cells become senescent remains unclear. We demonstrate that DNA damage leads to a greater level of senescence rather than apoptosis in DBC1-deficient cells. In addition, we show that BLM becomes degraded during DNA damage, which induces p21 expression and senescence. DBC1 binds to and shields BLM from degradation, thus suppressing senescence. ML216 promotes DBC1–BLM interaction, which aids in the preservation of BLM following DNA damage and suppresses senescence. ML216 enhances pulmonary function by lowering the levels of senescence and fibrosis in both aged mice and a mouse model of bleomycin-induced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Our data reveal a unique mechanism preventing DNA-damaged cells from becoming senescent, which may be regulated by the use of ML216 as a potential treatment for senescence-related diseases.
Senescence
Cite
Citations (4)
A damage is a general event in the life of cells and may lead to mutation, cancer, and cell/organ death. DNA damage occurring in different phases of cell cycle can activate different damage checkpoint pathways to halt the progress of cell cycle in order to provide time for DNA damage repair. If DNA damage cannot be repaired, cellular apoptosis may be induced. Therefore, DNA damage checkpoint is of great significance for cell survival after DNA damage. This article summarizes recent research on DNA damage responses, including DNA damage checkpoint, DNA damage repair, transcriptional response, and cell apoptosis. We focus on how the DNA damage checkpoint pathway is activated after DNA damage, as well as the functional mechanism of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. The review aims to help readers understand the great significance of DNA damage checkpoint pathway, providing a theoretical basis for its application in radiotherapy and chemotherapy for cancer.
Key words:
DNA damage; Checkpoint pathway; Cell cycle; Signal transduction; Cell apoptosis
CHEK1
Cite
Citations (0)
The DNA damage response (DDR) is a coordinated signaling network that ensures the maintenance of genome stability under DNA damaging stress. In response to DNA lesions, activation of the DDR leads to the establishment of cell cycle checkpoints that delay cell-cycle progression and allow repair of the defects. The tumor suppressor p27Kip1 is a cyclin-CDK inhibitor that plays an important role in regulating quiescence in a variety of tissues. Several studies have suggested that p27Kip1 also plays a role in the maintenance of genomic integrity. Here we demonstrate that p27Kip1 is essential for the establishment of a G1 checkpoint arrest after DNA damage. We also uncovered that ATM phosphorylates p27Kip1 on a previously uncharacterized residue (Ser-140), which leads to its stabilization after induction of DNA double-strand breaks. Inhibition of this stabilization by replacing endogenous p27Kip1 with a Ser-140 phospho-mutant (S140A) significantly sensitized cells to IR treatments. Our findings reveal a novel role for p27Kip1 in the DNA damage response pathway and suggest that part of its tumor suppressing functions relies in its ability to mediate a G1 arrest after the induction of DNA double strand breaks.
CHEK1
Cite
Citations (26)
The tumor suppressor p53 is a canonical inducer of cellular senescence (irreversible loss of proliferative potential and senescent morphology). p53 can also cause reversible arrest without senescent morphology, which has usually been interpreted as failure of p53 to induce senescence. Here we demonstrate that p53-induced quiescence actually results from suppression of senescence by p53. In previous studies, suppression of senescence by p53 was masked by p53-induced cell cycle arrest. Here, we separated these two activities by inducing senescence through overexpression of p21 and then testing the effect of p53 on senescence. We found that in p21-arrested cells, p53 converted senescence into quiescence. Suppression of senescence by p53 required its transactivation function. Like rapamycin, which is known to suppress senescence, p53 inhibited the mTOR pathway. We suggest that, while inducing cell cycle arrest, p53 may simultaneously suppress the senescence program, thus causing quiescence and that suppression of senescence and induction of cell cycle arrest are distinct functions of p53. Thus, in spite of its ability to induce cell cycle arrest, p53 can act as a suppressor of cellular senescence.
Senescence
Cite
Citations (256)
Senescence
CHEK1
Cite
Citations (170)