A literature review on sustainable lifestyles and recommendations for further research
22
Citation
44
Reference
20
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Cite
Strengths and weaknesses
Discipline
Cite
Citations (0)
Cite
Citations (0)
Biobanks and their collections are considered essential for contemporary biomedical research and a critical resource toward personalized medicine. However, they need to operate in a sustainable manner to prevent research waste and maximize impact. Sustainability is the capacity of a biobank to remain operative, effective, and competitive over its expected lifetime. This remains a challenge given a biobank's position at the interplay of ethical, societal, scientific, and commercial values and the difficulties in finding continuous funding. In the end, biobanks are responsible for their own sustainability. Still, biobanks also depend on their surrounding environment, which contains overarching legislative, policy, financial, and other factors that can either impede or promote sustainability. The Biobanking and Biomolecular Research Infrastructure for The Netherlands (BBMRI.nl) has worked on improving the national environment for sustainable biobanking. In this article, we present the final outcomes of this BBMRI.nl project. First, we summarize the current overarching challenges of the Dutch biobanking landscape. These challenges were gathered during workshops and focus groups with Dutch biobanks and their users, for which the full results are described in separate reports. The main overarching challenges relate to sample and data quality, funding, use and reuse, findability and accessibility, and the general image of biobanks. Second, we propose a package of recommendations—across nine themes—toward creating overarching conditions that stimulate and enable sustainable biobanking. These recommendations serve as a guideline for the Dutch biobanking community and their stakeholders to jointly work toward practical implementation and a better biobanking environment. There are undoubtedly parallels between the Dutch situation and the challenges found in other countries. We hope that sharing our project's approach, outcomes, and recommendations will support other countries in their efforts toward sustainable biobanking.
Cite
Citations (8)
Sustainability, the simultaneous management of economic, environmental and social dimensions in a supply chain is a challenging research area in supply chain management. Researchers have adopted different techniques to integrate the three components of sustainability. But the relationship between different sustainability initiatives and the performance outcomes are still to be analyzed systematically. In the present study, the review of various works published in sustainable supply chain management domain is carried out with a hybrid method of meta-analysis and content analysis. The research papers were selected based on different theories of sustainable development. The theories considered in the present study are the following; theory of population ecology, resource-based view theory, natural resource-based view theory, resource dependence theory, stakeholder theory, and transaction cost economics theory. The developments in the sustainable supply chain management area and the methodologies used for modelling and analysis are reviewed using this hybrid method by carefully analyzing the literature published during the period 2005-2017. This review will enable researchers in identifying the potential areas for research on sustainable supply chain management.
Stakeholder Theory
Resource Management
Cite
Citations (10)
Cite
Citations (0)
The report summarises the outcomes of the project Assessing the potential of various for sustainable consumption practices and greening of the market (ASCEE). The scope of the ASCEE project was to consider the latest trends in policies supporting sustainable consumption and production (SCP), and to indicate key elements of policies supporting sustainable consumption. Our main research emphasis dealt with innovative instruments, and practices to support sustainable consumption. The aim of ASCEE was to contribute to policy development - to indicate promising innovative and tools to foster sustainable consumption and - to present some strategic recommendations on how to progress in this arena. The structure of the report is as follows: the report describes the challenge of sustainable consumption in Chapter 1 and presents a short overview on selected European activities. The following Chapter 2 Innovative approaches reports on the three themes we distinguished, and presents our findings for the examined cases, supplemented by some additional empirical findings on innovative worth reporting, but not in the same level of detail as the nine cases. Our central findings are presented in chapter 3 Empirical Insights which highlights our findings and key messages. Chapter 4 Assessment of instruments is dedicated to the topic of assessment of political which forms an integral part of making sustainable consumption policy. It is followed by Chapter 5 Policy Recommendations which introduces our key recommendations addressed to policy-makers, public authorities and stakeholders. Finally, chapter 6 Outlook completes the report and hints at areas linked to sustainable consumption, but not dealt with in this report, and to important R&D topics.
Consumption
Scope (computer science)
Sustainable Consumption
Cite
Citations (0)
Cite
Citations (11)
The bottom up demand from consumers for more sustainable products, and the top down need to comply with government regulations motivates manufacturers to adopt tools and methods to evaluate their operations for opportunities to reduce environmental impact and improve competitiveness. Manufacturers have actively improved the sustainability of their products through the use of such tools and methods. However recently, manufacturers are struggling to maintain the necessary gains in energy and material efficiency due to the assessment inaccuracies of current ad hoc methods and their inability to identify large sustainability improvement opportunities. Overcoming this barrier requires standardized methods and tools that are implementable and which contain accurate manufacturing process-level information. To aid in developing such methods and tools, this study contrasts the perspective of industry and academic research on the topics of sustainable manufacturing metrics and measurements, and process modeling to determine the deficits that exist in enacting academic theory to practice. Furthermore, this study highlights some of the industry responses to the development of related standards for sustainability assessment.
Manufacturing
Cite
Citations (6)
Cite
Citations (0)
Scope (computer science)
Benchmarking
Action Research
Cite
Citations (4)