INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN SOME REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN SWINE
17
Citation
12
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
The associations between 15 preweaning traits in pigs were studied to determine which had the most important effects on litter weights at birth and weaning. The traits were litter size at birth and weaning, number born alive, percentage survival to birth and weaning, pig and litter weights at birth and weaning, daily gain from birth to weaning, gestation length, number of teats, weights of dam at farrowing and at weaning, and the change in dam weight during lactation. Of the 105 correlations, 66 were statistically significant, though many were markedly low. Litter weights at birth and weaning were significantly and relatively highly correlated with most of the other traits, whereas number of teats was correlated only with survival rates at birth and weaning and pig birth weight. The results showed that the importance of litter size was almost twice that of pig weight in determining litter weights at birth and weaning. The results in general indicated that most of the economically important traits related to swine reproductivity are favorably associated.Keywords:
Litter
Litter
Cite
Citations (3)
Bone remodeling
Bone mineral content
Cite
Citations (5)
The farrowing and 42-day weaning records for 453 litters (4,744 pigs farrowed and 3,775 pigs weaned) from five lines of breeding were analyzed to study factors influencing litter weaning weight and to determine the interrelationships between litter size, pig weights, litter weights, preweaning death loss and weight gain of dam during lactation. Litter weaning weight was determined to a larger extent by the number of pigs in the litter at weaning than by the weight of the pigs at weaning. The number of pigs farrowed in the litter had a slightly greater influence on the litter size at 42 days than did survival rate, but both were important factors in determining size of litter at weaning. Weight of the pig at 42 days was dependent principally on the pig's gain from birth to weaning and to a very limited degree on the pig's birth weight. Number of pigs in the litter at birth accounted for 67% of the variation in litter birth weight and for 28% of the variation in pig birth weight. Litter size at birth was significantly correlated with survival rate of the pigs to weaning (−.28), litter size at weaning (0.70), litter weaning weight (0.50) and pig weaning weight (−.49). Litters of 11 to 14 pigs farrowed resulted in more pigs weaned per litter than litters of 15 to 16 pigs. Since litter birth weight was largely a function of number of pigs in the litter (r=0.82), an increase in litter birth weight was associated with an increase in preweaning death loss, litter size at weaning and litter weaning weight, but with a decrease in pig weaning weight. However, an increase in pig birth weight was associated with an increase in survival rate (r=0.28) and pig weaning weight (r=0.54), and with smaller litter size at weaning (r=−.32). Weight loss of the dam during lactation was associated with increased litter size and litter weights. The average weight loss of the dam during lactation was 17.3 kg. with no significant difference detected between sows and gilts. Number of pigs weaned per litter was closely associated with litter weaning weight (r=0.79), and individual pig weaning weight decreased as litter size at weaning increased (r=−.51). The heaviest pigs at 42 days of age occurred in litters of three to four pigs for sows and in litters of less than six for gilts.
Litter
Cite
Citations (20)
Litter
Cite
Citations (34)
The effects of litter size and availability of solid feed before weaning on the growth mice were studied. Pups of small litters (n = 3) grew significantly faster than mice of large litters (n = 10), the mean difference at weaning being about 3 g. The difference in body mass persisted after weaning; at the age of 98 d the mean difference was about 5 g. Availability of solid feed to pre-weaned mice significantly stimulated mass gain of litters consisting of 10 but not of 3 pups. Body masses of the dams during the suckling period were markedly influenced by litter size: Mice with 10 pups had increased body masses when compared with mice having 3 young. By the time of weaning, body masses of mothers with larger or small litters had become similar again just as they were immediately after parturition.
Litter
Cite
Citations (1)
ABSTRACT One hundred and two Large White × Landrace Fl hybrid sows were allocated over four parities in a factorial design to two levels of target P2 backfat thickness at parturition (20 mm, F v. 12 mm, T), two levels of lactation feeding {ad libitum, H v. 3 kg/day, L), and two sizes of sucking litter (six v. 10). Sows attained 13 mm P2 when first mated at 126 kg live weight. Fatness (P2, mm) at weaning was significantly influenced by target fatness at parturition (14·2 v. 9·3), lactation feeding level (13·7 v. 10·0), and litter size (12·7 v. 11·0). Changes in backfat (P2, mm) during 28-day lactation were significantly influenced by target fatness at parturition (—5·0 v. —2·5), lactation feeding (-2 0 v. —5·4), and litter size (—2·9 v. -4·6). Sow live weight (kg) at weaning was significantly influenced by target fatness at parturition (211 v. 192), lactation feeding (218 v. 186), and litter size (208 v. 196). Changes in live weight (kg) during 28-day lactation were significantly influenced by target fatness at parturition (—26 v. — 12), lactation feeding (—5 v. —31), and litter size (—12 v. —25). With multiparous sows only, total food intake during 28-day lactation was negatively related to total food intake in pregnancy. Change in backfat (P2, mm) during 28-day lactation = -0·28 - 0·27 P2 at parturition + 0·04 lactation food intake — 0·50 litter size. Change in live weight (kg) during 28-day lactation = -3·8 — 0·15 live weight post partum + 0·36 lactation food intake — 3·3 litter size. Sows with target fat levels of 20 mm P2 at parturition had better food conversion efficiencies than sows with target fat levels of 12 mm. Target fatness at parturition, and especially lactation food intake, but not litter size, significantly influenced the interval (days) from weaning to oestrus in parity 1 (9·1 v. 14·2 and 7·8 v. 15·3, but 11·6 v. 11·5), while n i subsequent parities only litter size influenced the interval (days) from weaning to oestrus (6·0 v. 8·0). Birth weight (kg) of piglets was influenced only marginally by target fatness at parturition (1·4 v. 1·2) in parity 1, and not by the other factors, or in subsequent parities. Piglet growth rate was affected by both target fatness at parturition and litter size, but by lactation feeding level only in the last week of lactation. The relationship between fatness at weaning (mm) and the weaning to oestrus interval (days) for primiparous sows can be expressed as 26·6 — 1·28 P2. High level feeding in lactation imparted production and efficiency benefit in both primiparous and multiparous sows, while pregnancy feeding to a target of 20 mm rather than 12 mm at parturition was of benefit for primiparous sows.
Litter
Cite
Citations (129)
Litter
Cite
Citations (319)
SUMMARY Several studies have suggested that lactation performance may be programmed by the number of fetuses during pregnancy, whereas other studies indicate that processes during lactation are more important. As gestation litter size and litter size in lactation are usually strongly correlated, separating the roles of pregnancy and lactation in lactation performance is difficult. To break this link, we experimentally manipulated litter size of MF1 mice to five or 16 pups per litter by cross-fostering. Litter size and mass at birth were recorded on day 1 of lactation prior to litter size manipulation. Maternal body mass and food intake, litter size and litter mass were measured daily throughout. After weaning, the potential differential utilisation of body tissues of the mothers was investigated. Relationships between maternal mass and food intake, including asymptotic daily food intake at peak lactation, offspring traits and other maternal parameters suggested that the number of fetuses the females had carried during pregnancy had no effect on lactation performance. Litter mass increases depended only on maternal food intake, which was highly variable between individuals, but was independent of fetal litter size. The sizes of key organs and tissues like the liver and alimentary tract were not related to maximal food intake at peak lactation or to fetal litter size, but the masses of the pelage, mammary glands and retroperitoneal fat pad were. These data suggest that while growth of the mammary glands and associated structures may be initiated in gestation, and vary in relation to the number of placentas, the ultimate sizes and activities of the tissues depends primarily on factors during lactation.
Litter
Cite
Citations (20)
Increased reproductive effort may lead to trade-offs with future performance and impact offspring, thereby influencing optimal current effort level. We experimentally enlarged or reduced litter size in mice during their first lactation, and then followed them through a successive unmanipulated lactation. Measurements of food intake, body mass, milk energy output (MEO), litter size and litter mass were taken. Offspring from the first lactation were also bred to investigate their reproductive success. In their first lactation, mothers with enlarged litters (n=9, 16 pups) weaned significantly smaller pups, culled more pups, and increased MEO and food intake compared with mothers with reduced litters (n=9, 5 pups). In the second lactation, no significant differences in pup mass or litter size were observed between groups, but mothers that had previously reared enlarged litters significantly decreased pup mass, MEO and food intake compared with those that had reared reduced litters. Female offspring from enlarged litters weaned slightly smaller pups than those from reduced litters, but displayed no significant differences in any of the other variables measured. These results suggest that females with enlarged litters suffered from a greater energetic burden during their first lactation, and this was associated with lowered performance in a successive reproductive event and impacted on their offspring's reproductive performance. Female 'choice' about how much to invest in the first lactation may thus be driven by trade-offs with future reproductive success. Hence, the 'limit' on performance may not be a hard physiological limit. These data support the ecological context hypothesis.
Cite
Citations (7)