Liver transplantation in the era of model for end‐stage liver disease
42
Citation
18
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Abstract: Liver transplantation is challenged by organ shortage and prolonged waiting list time. The goal of the ideal organ allocation system is to transplant individuals least likely to survive without a liver transplantation, and maintain appropriate rates of postoperative survival. Currently, liver allocation in the United States is based on the model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD). Studies have shown MELD to be objective and accurate in predicting short‐term survival in patients with cirrhosis.Keywords:
Economic shortage
Liver disease
Waiting list
Mortality in patients with end‐stage liver disease above model for end‐stage liver disease 3.0 of 40
Since the implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score to determine waitlist priority for liver transplant (LT) in 2002, the score has been capped at 40. Recently, the MELD 3.0 score was proposed to improve upon MELD-Na. Here, we examine waitlist mortality and LT outcomes in patients with MELD 3.0 ≥ 40 to assess the potential impact of uncapping the score.
Liver disease
Cite
Citations (11)
As the mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score at time of liver transplantation continues to increase, it is crucial to implement preemptive strategies to reduce wait-list mortality. We review the most common complications that arise in patients with a high MELD score in an effort to highlight strategies that can maximize survival and successful transplantation.
Liver disease
Waiting list
Cite
Citations (13)
Abstract The previous Korean liver allocation system was based on Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores, but increasing numbers of deceased donors created a pressing need to develop an equitable, objective allocation system based on model for end-stage liver disease scores (MELD scores). A nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of candidates registered for liver transplantation from January 2009 to December 2011 was conducted at 11 transplant centers. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to stratify MELD score ranges according to waitlist survival. Of the 2702 patients that registered for liver transplantation, 2248 chronic liver disease patients were eligible. CART analysis indicated several MELD scores significantly predicted waitlist survival. The 90-day waitlist survival rates of patients with MELD scores of 31–40, 21–30, and ≤20 were 16.2%, 64.1%, and 95.9%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Furthermore, the 14-day waitlist survival rates of severely ill patients (MELD 31–40, n = 240) with MELD scores of 31–37 (n = 140) and 38–40 (n = 100) were 64% and 43.4%, respectively ( P = 0.001). Among patients with MELD > 20, presence of HCC did not affect waitlist survival ( P = 0.405). Considering the lack of donor organs and geographic disparities in Korea, we proposed the use of a national broader sharing of liver for the sickest patients (MELD ≥ 38) to reduce waitlist mortality. HCC patients with MELD ≤ 20 need additional MELD points to allow them equitable access to transplantation. Based on these results, the Korean Network for Organ Sharing implemented the MELD allocation system in 2016.
Liver disease
Cart
Cite
Citations (23)
1. Liver transplantation is currently offered as a therapeutic option for patients with a wide range of end-stage liver diseases. 2. Conventional wisdom suggests that patients who receive a liver transplant have a greater expected lifetime when compared to comparable candidates on the waiting list. 3. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) scoring system is an excellent predictor of mortality on the waiting list and also predicts mortality after liver transplantation. 4. The combination of waiting list mortality risk and posttransplant mortality risk assessed by MELD and other factors can be used to estimate whether candidates are likely to derive a survival benefit from a liver transplant.
Waiting list
Liver disease
Cite
Citations (103)
Liver disease
Cite
Citations (31)
Waiting list
Liver disease
Cite
Citations (15)
Background. In June 2016, the Korean Network for Organ Sharing implemented a Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score-based allocation system to better prioritize deceased-donor liver transplant (DDLT) candidates. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of this allocation system. Methods. We compared waiting list and posttransplant outcomes during the first year of operation of the MELD allocation system (from June 2016 to May 2017) with an equivalent period before its implementation (from June 2015 to May 2016). Results. A total of 3041 candidates were listed for DDLT (1464 pre-MELD, 1577 post-MELD era) and 892 patients received DDLT during the study period. A decrease in waiting list mortality and an increase in DDLT rate were observed after MELD implementation. However, the number of living donor liver transplants did not differ significantly pre- to post-MELD. As was expected, introduction of the MELD allocation system increased mean MELD scores at DDLT (24.1 ± 8.3 pre-MELD, 34.5 ± 7.0 post-MELD era, P < 0.001). Posttransplant patient survival rates at 1-year were 79.9% in pre-MELD era and 76.2% in post-MELD era ( P = 0.184). The proportion of interregional organ transfer increased from 25.1% to 40.5%. Furthermore, transplant benefits increased with MELD scores. Conclusions. The MELD system was found to address the goal of fairness well. Implementation of the MELD system improved equity in terms of access to DDLT regardless of regions. Although a greater proportion of more severely ill patients received DDLT after MELD implementation, posttransplant survivals remained unchanged.
Liver disease
Equity
Cite
Citations (14)
Liver disease
Waiting list
Cite
Citations (0)
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is considered to be a good predictor of disease status in patients with end-stage liver disease and has been used for organ distribution in liver transplantation. This article briefly describes the relationship between MELD, MELD-Na score and the mortality of patients waiting for liver transplantation, the intraoperative blood transfusion, the survival, complications, and re-transplantation after liver transplantation.
Key words:
End stage liver disease; Liver transplantation; MELD-Na score; Postoperative complications
Liver disease
Cite
Citations (0)
Background data: Liver transplantation is the best therapeutic option for patients with end- stage liver disease due to its excellent long term survival results. The demand for deceased donor liver transplantation vastly exceeds the supply. In the U.S. the Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score is now used for allocation in liver transplantation waiting lists, replacing the Child- Turcotte- Pugh (CTP) score. The MELD system is based on the risk of death without transplantation and was originally developed for survival estimation in patients after TIPS. The majority of the European countries still use the CTP score for liver organ allocation. However, there is a debate whether the MELD score is superior CTP to predict mortality in patients with cirrhosis on waiting list and after liver transplantation.
Liver disease
Waiting list
Cite
Citations (0)