Reproducibility and Performance of Virtual Karyotyping With SNP Microarrays for the Detection of Chromosomal Imbalances in Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissues
Karla AlvarezShera KashMaureen A. Lyons‐WeilerHyun-Jung KimL. E. PetersonBenita MathaiJill HagenkordFederico A. Monzon
24
Citation
27
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Chromosomal imbalances are commonly seen in cancer and inherited genetic diseases. These imbalances may assist in the diagnosis, prognosis, and/or therapeutic management of certain neoplasms. Several methods for detecting chromosomal imbalances, such as, fluorescent in situ hybridization, array comparative genomic hybridization, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays have proven useful in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Here, we report the performance and reproducibility of virtual karyotyping of FFPE tissues with Affymetrix SNP arrays.Virtual karyotypes from 442 FFPE tumor samples were generated using the Affymetrix GeneChip Mapping 10K Xba 2.0 and/or 250K Nsp SNP mapping arrays. Samples ranged from a few weeks to 17 years in archival storage. Virtual karyotypes were assessed for copy number changes, loss of heterozygosity, and acquired uniparental disomy.Overall, 75.3% of samples produced interpretable virtual karyotypes with the 10K arrays and 76.7% in the 250K arrays. Parameters for the selection of samples for hybridization were determined, which increased the success rate in both platforms to 81.3 and 92.6%, respectively. FFPE virtual karyotypes generated with both 10K Xba 2.0 and 250K Nsp arrays showed 100% concordance in intralaboratory and interlaboratory reproducibility studies. Samples older than 7 years showed decreased performance.SNP arrays are a reliable, reproducible, and robust platform for the virtual karyotyping of FFPE tumor tissues with performance characteristics adequate for clinical application. Parameters that most significantly affected sample performance were sample age and storage conditions.Keywords:
SNP array
SNP
Uniparental disomy
Concordance
Comparative genomic hybridization
AIM: To assess the value of the genome-wide human single nucleotide polymorphism( SNP) array for the investigation of the origin and pathogenic mechanisms and the genetic counseling of uniparental disomy( UPD).METHODS: Genetic analysis with the genome-wide human SNP array was carried out on the fetal cells in amniotic fluid and the peripheral blood cells from 124 pregnant women with high risk of Down's syndrome,whose G-banded chromosome karyotype analysis was done using the fetal cells in amniotic fluid. The peripheral blood cells from the fetuses' fathers were also taken for SNP array analysis. RESULTS: Two cases of segmental UPD 16 were found from the SNP array analysis of the fetal cells in amniotic fluid. The regions of isodisomy in one case were located in 16p12. 2 ～ 13. 3 and 16q24. 1 ～ 24. 3,and the region of the other was located in 16q21 ～ 24. 3. Both cases of UPD were maternal upon the genetic linkage analysis of the peripheral blood cells of the parents. CONCLUSION: The genes that induce the fetal growth restriction are probably located at the ends of long arm and short arm of chromosome 16. SNP array can identify the parental origins and the pathogenic mechanisms of UPD,which provides the assistance for genetic counseling.
Uniparental disomy
SNP array
SNP
Cite
Citations (0)
Comparative genomic hybridization
Cite
Citations (14)
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of genomic DNA was first applied in postnatal diagnosis for patients with intellectual disability (ID) and/or congenital anomalies (CA). Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis was subsequently implemented as the first line diagnostic test for ID/CA patients in our laboratory in 2009, because its diagnostic yield is significantly higher than that of routine cytogenetic analysis. In addition to the detection of copy number variations, the genotype information obtained with SNP array analysis enables the detection of stretches of homozygosity and thereby the possible identification of recessive disease genes, mosaic aneuploidy, or uniparental disomy. Patient-parent (trio) information analysis is used to screen for the presence of any form of uniparental disomy in the patient and can determine the parental origin of a de novo copy number variation. Moreover, the outcome of a genotype analysis is used as a final quality control by ruling out potential sample mismatches due to non-paternity or sample mix-up. SNP array analysis is now also used in our laboratory for patients with disorders for which locus heterogeneity is known (homozygosity pre-screening), in prenatal diagnosis in case of structural ultrasound anomalies, and for patients with leukemia. In this report, we summarize our array findings and experiences in the various diagnostic applications and demonstrate the power of a SNP-based array platform for molecular karyotyping, because it not only significantly improves the diagnostic yield in both constitutional and cancer genome diagnostics, but it also enhances the quality of the diagnostic laboratory workflow.
Uniparental disomy
SNP array
SNP
Copy number analysis
SNP genotyping
Comparative genomic hybridization
Molecular Inversion Probe
Cite
Citations (42)
Comparative genomic hybridization
Cite
Citations (22)
We applied a combination of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to characterize the genetic aberrations in three osteosarcomas (OS) and one Ewing's sarcoma. CGH identified recurrent chromosomal losses at 10p14-pter and gains at 8q22.3-24.1 in OS. Interphase FISH allowed to confirm 8q gain in two cases. A high amplification level of 11q12-qter was detected in one OS. The Ewing's sarcoma showed gain at 1p32-36.1 as the sole chromosome alteration. These studies demonstrate the value of molecular cytogenetic methods in the characterization of recurrent genomic alterations in bone tumor tissue.
Comparative genomic hybridization
Interphase
Cite
Citations (2)
Comparative genomic hybridization
Interphase
Cite
Citations (12)
Summary. Chromosomal abnormalities, such as 13q deletions, are emerging as important prognostic factors in multiple myeloma. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using specific DNA probes is the technique most widely used for the determination of genomic aberrations in this disease. The utility of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for molecular diagnostics in plasma cell malignancies has not been systematically analysed. We investigated tumour samples of patients with multiple myeloma ( n = 43) or plasma cell leukaemia ( n = 3) using CGH and FISH with five DNA probes localized to chromosome bands 1p22, 6q21, 11q22–q23, 13q14 and 17p13. By CGH, the most frequent genomic changes were gains on chromosomes 1q, 9q and 11q, as well as losses on chromosomes 13q, 6q, Xp and Xq. By FISH, trisomy 11q was identified at a similar frequency to the 13q deletion (42%). Compared with FISH data, the sensitivity of CGH was 80·7% and the specificity was 97·5%. Thirty‐two aberrations found by FISH were not identified by CGH, mostly as a result of the proportion of cells carrying the respective aberrations, or because of the limited spatial resolution of CGH. Our data indicate that, for clinical molecular diagnostics in multiple myeloma, FISH with a disease‐specific DNA probe set is superior to CGH analysis.
Comparative genomic hybridization
Trisomy
Hybridization probe
Plasma cell neoplasm
Cite
Citations (46)
Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was applied to screen the genetic events in six invasive urinary bladder cancers. These cases were also studied by flow cytometry (FCM) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Four samples showed partial gain on chromosome 8, with the common region involved was on 8q23-qter. Full or partial deletion on chromosome 2 and 17p in addition to gain on 20q was found in two cases. Interestingly one diploid tumor with low mitotic index, stage and grade showed more genetic aberrations (8 gains and 7 losses) by CGH than other aneuploid tumors with high mitotic index, stage and grade. The numerical chromosomal aberration detected by FISH for chromosomes 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 17 were 50% in T1 cases and 100% in T2-T4 cases. FISH was performed on chromosome 8q and 17p to compare and validate the sensitivity of CGH. The agreement was 100% for 8q24 locus and 50% for p53 locus. This indicates that different molecular genetic techniques showed relatively different aspect of genomic aberrations.
Comparative genomic hybridization
Mitotic index
Cite
Citations (21)
Uniparental disomy
SNP array
Comparative genomic hybridization
SNP
Concordance
Cite
Citations (52)
The amplification of chromosome 9p24.1 encoding PD-L1, PD-L2, and JAK2 has been reported in multiple types of cancer and is associated with poor outcome, upregulation of PD-L1, and activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. We have developed a novel fluorescence in situ hybridization assay which combines 3 probes mapping to 9p24.1 with a commercial chromosome 9 centromere (CEN9) probe for detection of the JAK2/9p24.1 amplification. JAK2 fluorescence in situ hybridization was compared with array-based comparative genomic hybridization in 34 samples of triple negative breast cancer tumor. By array-based comparative genomic hybridization, 15 had 9p24.1 copy-number gain (log2ratio>0.3) and 19 were classified as non-gain (log2ratio≤0.3). Copy-number gain was defined as JAK2/CEN9 ratio ≥1.1 or average JAK2 signals≥3.0. Twelve of 15 samples with copy-number gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization were also detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Eighteen of 19 samples classified as copy-number non-gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization were concordant by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. The sensitivity and specificity of the fluorescence in situ hybridization assay was 80% and 95%, respectively (P=0.02). The sample with the highest level of amplification by array-based comparative genomic hybridization (log2ratio=3.6) also scored highest by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ratio=8.2). There was a correlation between the expression of JAK2 and amplification status (Mean 633 vs 393, P=0.02), and there was a trend of association with PD-L1 RNA expression (Mean 46 vs 22, P=0.11). No significant association was observed between PD-L1 immunohistochemistry expression and copy-number gain status. In summary, the novel array-based comparative genomic hybridization assay for detection of chromosome 9p24.1 strongly correlates with the detection of copy-number gain by array-based comparative genomic hybridization. In triple negative breast cancer, this biomarker may identify a relevant subset of patients for targeted molecular therapies.
Comparative genomic hybridization
Cite
Citations (24)