Abstract:
Application of the knowledge of syntax, morphology, and semantics to acoustic analysis and semantic achievement is discussed. An acoustic analyzer which is restricted by syntax rules and morphology rules is proposed. The semantic achievement procedure based on syntactic structure analysis and semantic deep structure is used to obtain the meaning of input speech. In addition, to make the system accept fairly natural speech, a multiparameter segmentation method is described. The authors present experimental results obtained using the system.< This paper examines the controversial disagreement among schools of Arabic syntax; according to which, the syntactic components and rules classified and investigated thoroughly. The research tries to answer the following questions: What is meant by controversial disagreement on syntax? And what are the reasons behind it? What is the true nature of syntax schools? What are their types? What are the negative and positive impacts of that controversial disagreement? The paper traces back the controversial disagreement on Arabic syntax and defines its advantages. There are several previous studies dealing with this question, however; this research paper examines the linguistic and terminological aspects of that disagreement among schools of Basrah, Kufa, Baghdad, Andalusia, and Egypt. Despite their disagreement, the syntax schools have one aim: serving the syntax and keeping it flawless. Through this paper, it is attempted to present all these aspects. It concludes and confirms that disagreement on syntax among grammarians is a normal issue, which confirms the fact that syntax is flawlessness. Thus, one can say that having different viewpoints does not necessarily harm syntax; however, it makes it more solid and flawless. Furthermore, the disagreement among the syntax schools has positive and negative impacts in enriching Arabic syntax.
Viewpoints
Syntax error
Cite
Citations (0)
Preview this article: The syntax–semantics interface and the origins of philosophy, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/ml.4.1.07lam-1.gif
Interface (matter)
Cite
Citations (0)
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Content (measure theory)
Cite
Citations (0)
In this paper, we perform re-labeling to evaluate the performance of semantic segmentation in a specific environment. By verifying the performance given new type of labels, the potential for future applications is confirmed. To check the performance, we use the BiSeNet V2 network which shows good performance in real-time semantic segmentation. In BiSeNet V2, low-level details and high-level semantics are individually trained to achieve high accuracy and real-time semantic segmentation performance. Using the reconstructed labels from the Cityscapes dataset composed of 2048x1024 images, the real-time semantic segmentation performance was evaluated, achieving an accuracy of 80.9% and a speed of 111 FPS.
Cite
Citations (0)
Cite
Citations (2)
(1980). On the syntax and semantics of the modal auxiliary had Better. Studia Neophilologica: Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 47-53.
Cite
Citations (5)
Eschatological Conspiracy Theories: Models and Ways for Identifying Apocalyptic Semantics and Syntax
Book review: Shnirelman V. A a. (2022). Katechon. From Apocalypse to Conspiracy Theories, Moscow; Saint Petersb urg: Nestor–History, 424 p.
Cite
Citations (0)
This paper presents LTAG semantics of focus and focus-sensitive quantifiers which adopts alternative semantics of focus (Rooth 1985 and subsequent work). It proposes that focused lexical items make its contribution at the level of elementary trees, so that each elementary tree is associated with two semantic representations: its ordinary semantic representation and its focus representation. Based on the semantic framework, discussed in Kallmeyer and Joshi 2003 and Kallmeyer and Romero 2004, the paper develops a compositional analysis of focus representations, and extends this analysis to focusing adverbs and adverbs of quantification.
Representation
Lexical Semantics
Cite
Citations (5)
Preview this article: Reseña de “The Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics of Spanish Mood” de Henk Haverkate, Page 1 of 1 < Previous page | Next page > /docserver/preview/fulltext/sic.1.1.10leo-1.gif
Cite
Citations (0)
This paper examines the controversial disagreement among schools of Arabic syntax; according to which, the syntactic components and rules classified and investigated thoroughly. The research tries to answer the following questions: What is meant by controversial disagreement on syntax? And what are the reasons behind it? What is the true nature of syntax schools? What are their types? What are the negative and positive impacts of that controversial disagreement? The paper traces back the controversial disagreement on Arabic syntax and defines its advantages. There are several previous studies dealing with this question, however; this research paper examines the linguistic and terminological aspects of that disagreement among schools of Basrah, Kufa, Baghdad, Andalusia, and Egypt. Despite their disagreement, the syntax schools have one aim: serving the syntax and keeping it flawless. Through this paper, it is attempted to present all these aspects. It concludes and confirms that disagreement on syntax among grammarians is a normal issue, which confirms the fact that syntax is flawlessness. Thus, one can say that having different viewpoints does not necessarily harm syntax; however, it makes it more solid and flawless. Furthermore, the disagreement among the syntax schools has positive and negative impacts in enriching Arabic syntax.
Viewpoints
Syntax error
Cite
Citations (0)