Neurog2 Simultaneously Activates and Represses Alternative Gene Expression Programs in the Developing Neocortex
Christopher P. KovachRajiv DixitSaiqun LiPierre MattarGrey WilkinsonGina E. ElsenDeborah M. KurraschRobert F. HevnerCarol Schuurmans
49
Citation
58
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Progenitor cells undergo a series of stable identity transitions on their way to becoming fully differentiated cells with unique identities. Each cellular transition requires that new sets of genes are expressed, while alternative genetic programs are concurrently repressed. Here, we investigated how the proneural gene Neurog2 simultaneously activates and represses alternative gene expression programs in the developing neocortex. By comparing the activities of transcriptional activator (Neurog2-VP16) and repressor (Neurog2-EnR) fusions to wild-type Neurog2, we first demonstrate that Neurog2 functions as an activator to both extinguish Pax6 expression in radial glial cells and initiate Tbr2 expression in intermediate neuronal progenitors. Similarly, we show that Neurog2 functions as an activator to promote the differentiation of neurons with a dorsal telencephalic (i.e., neocortical) identity and to block a ventral fate, identifying 2 Neurog2-regulated transcriptional programs involved in the latter. First, we show that the Neurog2-transcriptional target Tbr2 is a direct transcriptional repressor of the ventral gene Ebf1. Secondly, we demonstrate that Neurog2 indirectly turns off Etv1 expression, which in turn indirectly regulates the expression of the ventral proneural gene Ascl1. Neurog2 thus activates several genetic off-switches, each with distinct transcriptional targets, revealing an unappreciated level of specificity for how Neurog2 prevents inappropriate gene expression during neocortical development.Keywords:
Progenitor
The artificial basic repressor SSB24 represses transcription of a reporter construct activated by GCN4. We show that the positively charged SSB24 and the negatively charged acidic activator GCN4 interact in vitro and in vivo. However, deleting the interaction domain from the GCN4 activator does not result in loss of repression by SSB24. Similarly, transcription activated by the holoenzyme component SRB2 is repressed, although SSB24 and SRB2 do not interact. Repression by SSB24 therefore does not depend on the observed protein‐protein interaction between SSB24 and GCN4.
Transcription
Cite
Citations (15)
Appropriate regulation of gene expression is essential to ensure that protein synthesis occurs in a selective manner. The control of transcription is the most dominant type of regulation mediated by a complex of molecules such as transcription factors. In general, regulatory molecules are of two types: activator and repressor. Activators promote the initiation of transcription whereas repressors inhibit transcription. In many cases, they regulate the gene transcription on binding the promoter mutually exclusively and the observed gene expression response is either graded or binary. In experiments, the gene expression response is quantified by the amount of proteins produced on varying the concentration of an external inducer molecules in the cell. In this paper, we study a gene regulatory network where activators and repressors both bind the same promoter mutually exclusively. The network is modeled by assuming that the gene can be in three possible states: repressed, unregulated, and active. An exact analytical expression for the steady-state probability distribution of protein levels is then derived. The exact result helps to explain the experimental observations that in the presence of activator molecules the response is graded at all inducer levels, whereas in the presence of both activator and repressor molecules, the response is graded at low and high inducer levels and binary at an intermediate inducer level.
Inducer
Transcription
Cite
Citations (15)
Abstract Neural progenitor cells must be maintained during development in order to produce the full complement of neuronal and glial derivatives. While molecular pathways have been identified that inhibit progenitor differentiation, it is unclear whether the progenitor state itself is actively maintained. In this study, we have investigated the role of Tcf7l1 (formerly named Tcf3) in maintaining spinal progenitor characteristics and allowing the continued production of neurons and glia following primary neurogenesis. We find that spinal cord progenitor markers are progressively lost in embryos lacking Tcf7l1, and that the number of proliferative progenitors decreases accordingly. Furthermore, we show that the production of both neuronal and glial secondary derivatives of the pMN progenitor pool requires Tcf7l1. Together, these results indicate that Tcf7l1 plays an important role in spinal cord progenitor maintenance, indicating that this core function is conserved throughout multiple epithelial cell populations. Developmental Dynamics 240:2256–2264, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Progenitor
Cite
Citations (10)
Abstract Well-controlled gene expression is critical for the proper development and function of many traits. Highly-specific temporal and spatial expression patterns are often due to the overlapping activities of activator and repressor sequences that form cis -regulatory elements called enhancers. While many studies have shown that evolutionary changes in enhancers can result in novel traits, few studies illuminate how enhancers originate, how activator and repressor sequences interact during enhancer evolution, and the order in which they evolve. Here, we traced the evolutionary origin of a recently evolved enhancer that drives the expression of the fatty acyl-CoA elongase, bond , specifically in the semicircular wall epithelium (swe) of the Drosophila male ejaculatory bulb (EB). We show that this enhancer consists of two activator regions that drive bond expression in the entire EB and a repressor region that restricts expression specifically to the EB swe. Interestingly, the repressor region preceded the evolution of the two activator regions. The evolution of the first activator region, consisting of two putative Abdominal-B sites, did not drive expression in the EB due to the action of the repressor region. Expression of bond in the EB swe requires the evolution of the second activator region, which does not drive expression on its own, but synergizes with the first activator region and the repressor region to produce a highly-specific spatial expression pattern. Our results show that the origin and evolution of a novel enhancer require multiple steps and the evolution of repressor sequences can precede the evolution of activator sequences.
Cite
Citations (0)
Intermediate progenitor cells constitute a second proliferative cell type in the developing mammalian cerebral cortex. Little is known about the factors that govern the production of intermediate progenitors. Although persistent expression of stabilized β-catenin was found to delay the maturation of radial glial progenitors into intermediate progenitors, the relationship between β-catenin signaling and intermediate progenitors remains poorly understood. Using a transgenic reporter mouse for Axin2, a direct target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, we observed that β-catenin signaling is decreased in intermediate progenitor cells relative to radial glial progenitors. Conditional deletion of β-catenin from mouse cortical neural progenitors increased intermediate progenitor numbers, while conditional expression of stabilized β-catenin reduced the intermediate progenitor population. Together, these findings provide evidence that β-catenin signaling in radial progenitors negatively regulates intermediate progenitor cell number during cortical development.
Progenitor
AXIN2
Beta-catenin
Cite
Citations (69)
The adult human heart is unable to regenerate after various forms of injury, suggesting that this organ lacks a biologically meaningful endogenous stem cell pool. However, injecting the infarcted area of the adult mammalian heart with exogenously prepared progenitor cells of various types has been reported to create new myocardium by the direct conversion of these progenitor cells into cardiomyocytes. These reports remain controversial because follow-up studies from independent laboratories failed to observe such an effect. Also, the exact nature of various putative myocyte-producing progenitor cells remains elusive and undefined across laboratories. By comparison, the field has gradually worked toward a consensus viewpoint that proposes that the adult mammalian myocardium can undergo a low level of new cardiomyocyte renewal of ≈1% per year, which is primarily because of proliferation of existing cardiomyocytes but not from the differentiation of putative progenitor cells. This review will weigh the emerging evidence, suggesting that the adult mammalian heart lacks a definable myocyte-generating progenitor cell of biological significance.
Progenitor
Mammalian heart
Cell type
Cite
Citations (75)
Abstract Progenitor cells adapt their behavior in response to tissue demands. However, the molecular mechanisms controlling esophageal progenitor decisions remain largely unknown. Here we demonstrate the presence of a Troy ( Tnfrsf19 )-expressing progenitor subpopulation localized to defined regions along the mouse esophageal axis. Lineage tracing and mathematical modelling demonstrate that Troy- positive progenitor cells are prone to undergoing symmetrical fate choices and contribute to esophageal tissue homeostasis long-term. Functionally, TROY inhibits progenitor proliferation and enables commitment to differentiation without affecting fate symmetry. Whereas Troy expression is stable during esophageal homeostasis, progenitor cells downregulate Troy in response to tissue stress, enabling proliferative expansion of basal cells refractory to differentiation and reestablishment of tissue homeostasis. Our results demonstrate functional, spatially restricted, progenitor heterogeneity in the esophageal epithelium and identify how dynamic regulation of Troy coordinates tissue generation.
Progenitor
Cite
Citations (1)
Cyclic AMP-responsive element binding protein 1 (CREB1) plays multiple functions as a transcription factor in gene regulation. CREB1 proteins are also known to be expressed in several spliced isoforms that act as transcriptional activators or repressors. The activator isoforms, possessing the functional domains for kinase induction and for interaction with other transcriptional regulators, act as transcriptional activators. On the other hand, some isoforms, lacking those functional domains, are reported to be repressors that make heterodimers with activator isoforms. The complex and ingenious function for CREB1 arises in part from the variation in their spliced isoforms, which allows them to interact with each other. To date, however, the dimerization between the activator and repressor isoforms has not yet been proved directly in living cells. In this study, we applied fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy (FCCS) to demonstrate direct observation of dimerization between CREB1 activator and repressor. The FCCS is a well established spectroscopic method to determine the interaction between the different fluorescent molecules in the aqueous condition. Using differently labeled CREB1 isoforms, we successfully observed the interaction of CREB1 activator and repressor via dimerization in the nuclei of cultured cells. As a result, we confirmed the formation of heterodimer between CREB1 activator and repressor isoforms in living cells.
CREB1
Transcription
Cite
Citations (21)
YY1
Cite
Citations (39)