Height and risk of sudden cardiac death: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities and Cardiovascular Health Studies
Michael A. RosenbergFaye L. LopezPetra BůžkováSelçuk AdabağLin Y. ChenNona SotoodehniaRichard A. KronmalDavid S. SiscovickÁlvaro AlonsoAlfred E. BuxtonAaron R. FolsomKenneth J. Mukamal
20
Citation
41
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Cite
Citations (0)
We assessed the prognostic value of ECG left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) using Sokolow-Lyon (SL-LVH), Cornell voltage (CV-LVH) or Cornell product (CP-LVH) criteria in 3043 hypertensive people aged 80 years and over enrolled in the Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial.Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, stroke and heart failure in participants with and without LVH at baseline. The mean follow-up was 2.1 years.LVH identified by CV-LVH or CP-LVH criteria was associated with a 1.6-1.9-fold risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke. The presence of CP-LVH was associated with an increased risk of heart failure (hazard ratio 2.38, 95% CI 1.16-4.86). In sex-specific analyses, CV-LVH (hazard ratio 1.94, 95% CI 1.06-3.55) and CP-LVH (hazard ratio 2.36, 95% CI 1.25-4.45) were associated with an increased risk of stroke in women and of heart failure in men, CV-LVH (hazard ratio 6.47, 95% CI 1.41-29.79) and CP-LVH (10.63, 95% CI 3.58-31.57), respectively. There was no significant increase in the risk of any outcomes associated with Sokolow-Lyon-LVH. LVH identified by these three methods was not a significant predictor of all-cause mortality.Use of Cornell voltage and Cornell product criteria for LVH predicted the risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke. Only Cornell product was associated with an increased risk of heart failure. This was particularly the case in men. The identification of ECG LVH proved to be important in very elderly hypertensive people.
Stroke
Hypertensive heart disease
Cite
Citations (32)
Cite
Citations (1)
Cite
Citations (0)
Controversy exists concerning the necessary margin of excision for cutaneous melanoma 2 mm or greater in thickness.
Margin (machine learning)
Surgical excision
Cite
Citations (479)
Cite
Citations (0)
The prognostic role of survivin in colorectal carcinoma remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between survivin expression and survival outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma. A comprehensive literature search for relevant studies published up to April 2013 was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE and ISI Web of Science. Only articles in which survivin was detected by immunohistochemical staining were included. This meta-analysis was done using STATA and Review Manager. A total of 1784 patients from 14 studies were included in the analysis. Our results showed that survivin overexpression in patients with colorectal carcinoma was significantly associated with poor overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.505; 95% confidence interval, 1.197–1.893; P = 0.000) and disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.323; 95% confidence interval, 1.687–3.199; P = 0.000). The results indicated that a significant relationship between survivin expression and overall survival was also exhibited in studies with an Asian country (hazard ratio, 1.684; 95% confidence interval, 1.477–1.921), patient number >100 (hazard ratio, 1.604; 95% confidence interval, 1.371–1.877), the cut-off level <50% (hazard ratio, 1.449; 95% confidence interval, 1.045–2.010), the percentage of survivin overexpression >50% (hazard ratio, 1.528; 95% confidence interval, 1.056–2.211) and the hazard ratio estimated (hazard ratio, 1.643; 95% confidence interval, 1.262–2.139). Moreover, upregulation of survivin was associated with stages (III/IV vs. I/II: odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.80–1.46), the depth of invasion (T3/T4 vs. T1/T2: odds ratio, 1.79; 95% confidence interval 0.67–4.74), lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative: odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–2.26), distant metastasis (positive vs. negative: odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval, 0.99–5.72) and grade of differentiation (well/moderate vs. poor: odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.43–2.41), but without significance. The present meta-analysis indicated that upregulation of survivin was associated with poor prognosis in patients with colorectal carcinoma.
Survivin
Cite
Citations (26)
Cite
Citations (0)
Lymphadenectomy
Cite
Citations (6)