Distraction Osteogenesis of the Cleft Maxilla
18
Citation
0
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Distraction osteogenesis is a method of enhancing bony deficiencies of the hypoplastic cleft maxilla. Whether it is the result of inherited growth deficiency or of iatrogenic causes from operative intervention, 20 to 25% of cleft maxilla patients require maxillary advancement. Traditionally, this has been done by standard orthognathic surgery at varying LeFort levels. Predictable results have been achieved with standard techniques in minor to moderate maxillary hypoplasia; however, limited advancement and relapse is common in severe cases. Distraction osteogenesis has improved results in these patients by allowing soft tissue relaxation and gradual bone generation. Therefore, greater movement of the craniofacial skeleton is possible in severe cases of maxillary retrusion with lower relapse rates.Keywords:
Maxillary hypoplasia
Cephalometry
Classical orthognathic procedures have long been known to improve the facial esthetic contours and proportions of face by restoring the skeletal foundation, on which the soft-tissue drapes. Distraction osteogenesis was introduced to solve complex skeletal abnormalities in patients with craniofacial conditions that could not be solved by classical orthognathic surgery techniques. The gradual expansion in this group of patients showed not only greater skeletal stability, but the expansion at various tissue planes improved the facial appearance. In this report we review our experience in 22 cases with dentofacial skeletal abnormities for whom we believe achieved aesthetic outcomes could not habe been with classical orthognathic techniques alone. In addition, distraction at the interdental regions allowed for “tailoring” of the osteotomies and for simultaneous expansion at the occlusal level.
Interdental consonant
Cephalometry
Cite
Citations (3)
Patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) related deformities frequently have maxillary hypoplasia in all dimensions. These patients usually present with class III malocclusions, retruded midfaces and narrow hard palates. The skeletal problems can be treated by means of Le Fort I maxillary procedures. Surgical and orthodontic correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia, as often seen in CLP patients, has however proved to be challenging. The magnitude of the advancement is often hampered and the post operative stability significantly affected by palatal soft tissue scarring. The slow distraction of bone and the histogenic abilities of distraction osteogenesis (DO) have made it an atractive alternative treatment option for the management of maxillary hypoplasia in these patients. This paper presents the treatment results of 15 nongrowing CLP patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia treated by means of intra oral distraction. The mean anterior distraction of the maxillas was 12.7 mm (9-15.0 mm). The long-term cephalometric and clinical evaluation after a minimum of 60 months (mean follow-up 71 months) proved to be stable. The treatment results revealed, that distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing CLP patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia proved to be a predictable and stable option (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 26).
Maxillary hypoplasia
Cephalometry
Cite
Citations (10)
To simulate maxillary distraction osteogenesis and evaluate the change of soft and hard tissue before and after treatment, using Computer-Assisted Simulation System for Orthognathic Surgery( CASSOS 2001).A fourteen-year-old boy with severe maxillary hypoplasia, due to unilateral cleft lip and palate, was analysed by cephalometric analysis. The simulations of maxillary distraction osteogenesis (Le Fort I osteotomy and Le Fort II osteotomy) were re-analysed. After the treatment, cephalometric analysis was preformed again. The data were compared.The maxillary hypoplasia was well treated using maxillary distraction osteogenesis; Compared with Le fort I osteotomy, more satisfactory results can be obtained by Le fort I distraction osteogenesis.Maxillary distraction osteogenesis is a better way to treat severe maxillary hypoplasia with operated CLP than maxillary osteotomy. CASSOS 2001 can help surgeons and patients on simulation and evaluation of maxillary distraction osteogenesis, and on decision of treatment plan.
Maxillary hypoplasia
Cephalometric analysis
Cite
Citations (0)
Maxillary hypoplasia that necessitates surgical advancement affects approximately 25% of patients born with cleft lip and palate. Syndromic conditions such as Crouzon may also be accompanied by significant maxillary hypoplasia. Severe maxillary hypoplasia can result in airway obstruction, malocclusion, proptosis, and facial disfigurement. For optimal stability, severe hypoplasia is best addressed with maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Twenty-two patients (15 boys, 7 girls, ages 6-16 years, mean age 10 years) with severe midface hypoplasia underwent midface distraction with new internal maxillary distraction (IMD) device at our institution. Total distraction distances ranged from 15 to 30 mm. There were no major complications, and all of them had improvement in functional and aesthetic parameters. There were 2 minor complications and 2 patients failed to distract the full distance because of converging vectors. Early maxillary distraction in patients with severe midface hypoplasia is a useful technique to provide interval correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia before skeletal maturity and definitive orthognathic surgery is contemplated, and it is a good tool to improve occlusion, aesthetics, and self-perception in younger patients.
Maxillary hypoplasia
Crouzon syndrome
Cite
Citations (9)
Cite
Citations (21)
This study analyzed the outcomes of nongrowing patients with unilateral mandibular hypoplasia treated according to a specific protocol, which combines distraction osteogenesis, orthodontic treatment, and conventional osteotomies.The patients treated were objectively evaluated. Patient's satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Surgical changes were analyzed using cephalometry and three-dimensional facial surface data before surgery (T0) and at long-term (T1) follow-up.Four patients were included in this study. The normalization of facial proportion and a high increase in symmetry were evident. Residual defects were documented in the postoperative symmetry of the chin. In the questionnaire, all patients gave favorable responses to their facial changes; for most of the objective parameters, all patients improved.A multistage treatment protocol for the correction of facial deformities in patients with unilateral mandibular hypoplasia is a valid procedure for skeletal and occlusal stability. An evident improvement of the facial appearance is also achieved.
Facial symmetry
Cephalometry
Maxillary hypoplasia
Mandible (arthropod mouthpart)
Cite
Citations (3)
Objective To simulate maxillary distraction osteogenesis and evaluate the change of soft and hard tissue before and after treatment,using Computer-Assisted Simulation System for Orthognathic Surgery(CASSOS2001).Methods A fourteen-year-old boy with severe maxillary hypoplasia,due to unilateral cleft lip and palate,was analysed by cephalometric analysis.The simulations of maxillary distraction osteogenesis(Le Fort I osteotomy and Le Fort II osteotomy)were re-analysed.After the treatment,cephalometric analysis was preformed again.The data were compared.Results The maxillary hypoplasia was well treated using maxillary distraction osteogenesis;Compared with Le fort I osteotomy,more satisfactory results can be obtained by Le fort I distraction osteogenesis.Conclusion Maxillary distraction osteogenesis is a better way to treat severe maxillary hypoplasia with operated CLP than maxillary osteotomy.CASSOS2001can help surgeons and patients on simulation and evalution of maxillary distraction osteogenesis,and on decision of treatment plan.
Maxillary hypoplasia
Cephalometric analysis
Cite
Citations (0)
Dentofacial Deformity
Cite
Citations (0)
Maxillary hypoplasia in cleft lip and palate is a complex deformity. Despite surgical improvements, postoperative relapse persists. This systematic review was performed to determine the mean horizontal relapse rates for the surgical techniques used to treat maxillary hypoplasia: Le Fort I osteotomy with rigid fixation, Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis, and anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis. This study followed the PRISMA statement. The PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and Web of Science databases were searched through to June 2018. Studies on non-growing cleft lip and palate patients who had undergone one of the three surgical procedures and who had postoperative horizontal maxillary changes assessed at >6 months post-surgery were included. Stata SE was used to estimate pooled means, heterogeneity, and publication bias. The search strategy identified 326 citations, from which 24 studies were selected. Relapse rates following Le Fort I osteotomy with rigid fixation, Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis, and anterior maxillary distraction osteogenesis were 20%, 12%, and 12%, respectively. Relapse rates with and without bone grafting were 19% and 66%, respectively. The relapse rate following distraction osteogenesis with internal distraction was lower than that with external distraction. Study limitations were heterogeneity, which was above moderate, the low number of high-quality studies, and unidirectional assessment of postoperative maxillary movement.
Maxillary hypoplasia
Bone grafting
Cite
Citations (24)
Although maxillary distraction osteogenesis has been used for early treatment of midfacial hypoplasia, the inevitable osteotomies are still a complicated and invasive procedure for growing patients. Based on the bone-borne trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis, novel improvements to the approach were made to treat midfacial hypoplasia, and the clinical outcomes and skeletal changes were analyzed.Seventy consecutive growing cleft lip and palate patients with midfacial hypoplasia were treated with trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis. The distraction system consists of a rigid external distractor, nickel-titanium shape memory alloy spring, and bone-borne traction hooks. The whole distraction process was recorded in detail clinically. Lateral cephalographs and computed tomographic scans were taken and analyzed by cephalometric measurement and color-map analysis to assess the skeletal changes.All of the patients except one achieved satisfactory appearance and occlusal relationship. The unilateral maximum traction force presented an increased trend with age, but this relationship was not absolute. The whole trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis process was divided into three clinical stages: the startup period, the rapid movement period, and the consolidation period. Cephalometric analysis showed a great increase in SNA, ANB and horizontal movement of the maxillae after distraction, but with marginal relapse at 6 to 18 months postoperatively. Visualized changes of the midfacial skeleton were observed by three-dimensional color mapping. The results showed an unequal advancement in different regions.Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis process with adaptations offers an alternative method for the early treatment of midfacial hypoplasia in growing patients with cleft lip and palate.Therapeutic, IV.
Maxillary hypoplasia
Cephalometric analysis
Cite
Citations (27)