logo
    Coolidge Axis II Inventory Scale predictors of judgmental tendencies as measured by the First Impression Interaction Procedure
    4
    Citation
    37
    Reference
    10
    Related Paper
    Citation Trend
    Abstract In this study, we compared protocol validity rates between the MMPI–2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989 Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A. and Kaemmer, B. 1989. MMPI-2): Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory: Manual of administration and scoring Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]) and the Personality Assessment Inventory (Morey, 1991 Morey, L. C. 1991. The Personality Assessment Inventory professional manual Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. [Google Scholar]) in a veteran population. Veterans (N = 472) were administered both instruments as part of routine psychological evaluations. Profile validity was based on previously published criteria. When applying primary validity indicators, inpatients produced significantly fewer invalid PAI profiles (37%) than MMPI–2 profiles (63%). We found similar results among outpatients for which we considered 47% of MMPI–2 profiles invalid compared to only 21% of PAI profiles. When applying both primary and supplementary validity indicators, both inpatients and outpatients continued to produce fewer invalid PAI profiles than MMPI–2 profiles. We discuss factors that may be related to the differences in validity rates.
    Personality test
    California Psychological Inventory
    Citations (28)
    The concurrent validity of the MCMI as compared to the MMPI was assessed by administering both tests to 106 newly admitted outpatients and calculating the intercorrelations between these two tests. Of the 20 MCMI scales, 12 were found to correlate with the MMPI in a manner that suggested that they do measure some degree of personality dysfunction, emotional disturbance, or specific psychological symptomatology. Eight of the MCMI scales failed to show correlations that would indicate that they effectively measure any of the pathological personality characteristics or clinically significant symptom patterns known to be measured by the MMPI.
    Personality test
    Psychological Testing
    The Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) has been recently developed as an alternative to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) and shares some of its psychometric advantages and disadvantages with the MMPI-168, a short form of the MMPI. The current study compared the structure and utility of the MCMI and MMPI-168 for a general hospital inpatient psychiatric population. Overall, the two instruments were highly correlated and found to have conceptually similar factor structures. Empirical comparison of the factor structures indicated that construct validity is greatest for neurotic traits. Both instruments demonstrated a similar utility in predicting discharge diagnosis.
    Personality test
    Citations (17)
    The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2; Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) and the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-II (MCMI-II; Millon, 1987) were given to 306 men with substance use disorders, and scores on 45 MMPI-2 scales and 25 MCMI-II scales were analyzed separately into seven and five principal components. The first two components from both tests accounted for a majority of the explained variance and were well correlated across tests. They we re labeled Emotional Maladjustment and Antisocial Traits for both tests.
    Personality test
    Butcher
    In an effort to streamline the psychological testing process and reduce unnecessary testing, many managed care companies are precertifying psychological evaluations. Hence, it 'is incumbent upon psychologists to demonstrate the medical necessity of testing in a particular case. Oftentimes, however, reviewers will reimburse providers for either the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) or Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI), but not both. The rationale for this cost cutting measure is that both instruments are basically equivalent and hence redundant. The present study evaluated the MMPI and MCMI personality disorder scales for convergent and discriminative validity through the use of correlational data. Hotellinn's t-tests and codetype correspondence. The correlational data demonstrated a lack of c&vergen& and discrimination between wrsonality disorder classifications. Codetype correspondence between the two instruments was quite low, -fie most frequent MMPI personality disorder class...
    Personality test
    Convergent validity
    Citations (12)
    The present investigation shows that the addition of Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) high-point code data to the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) 78/87 code type may be used to clarify contradictory MMPI descriptors and produces three distinct dusters. These MMPI/MCMI clusters were designated as an interpersonally acting-in group, an emotionally acting-out group, and an emotionally acting-in group. In addition to the identification and elaboration of these three subgroups, we outline several clinical uses of this objective test battery approach. The results of this study support the efficacy of combining two objective assessment inventories for the purpose of multiaxial diagnosis as prescribed by the DSM-III.
    Personality test
    Identification
    Citations (20)
    Wiggins, Harris and Lingoes, and Serkownek Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) scores were used to predict Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MGMI) scores in a 100-patient sample. Equations from the first sample were cross-validated on a sample of 212 inmate subjects. We conclude that scores on 19 of the 20 MCMI scales can be successfully predicted by the Wiggins, Harris and Lingoes, and Serkownek subscales of the MMPI. In further cross-validation, the equations were used to predict the Morey, Waugh, and Blashfield MMPI composites for the prison sample, again with strongly positive results. The results appear quite promising for the estimation of personality disorder constructs from MMPI scales and subscales.
    Personality test
    Sample (material)
    A review of recent survey data indicates that the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI) ranks among the most frequently used tests by practicing clinicians. This instrument is surpassed only by the MMPI or MMPI-2 in the area of objective personality assessment.
    California Psychological Inventory
    Personality test
    Clinical Practice
    Psychological Testing
    Citations (22)