Assessment of the Efficacy of Anticancer Drugs by Amino Acid Metabolomics Using Fluorescence Derivatization-HPLC
Ryoko TomitaKenichiro TodorokiKazuyuki MachidaSho NishidaHiroshi MaruokaHideyuki YoshidaToshihiro FujiokaManabu NakashimaMasatoshi YamaguchiHitoshi Nohta
11
Citation
30
Reference
10
Related Paper
Citation Trend
Abstract:
Metabolomic studies conducted for evaluating cancer pathogenesis and progression by monitoring the amino acids metabolic balance hold great promise for assessing current and future anticancer treatments. We performed a comprehensive quantification of 21 amino acids concentrations in cultured human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells treated with the anticancer drugs 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and cisplatin. A precolumn fluorescence derivatization-HPLC method involving 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate was used. Amino acid concentration data were analyzed by principal-component analysis and partial least-squares multivariate statistical methods to represent samples on two-dimensional graphs. The hierarchical cluster analysis and linear discriminant analysis were used to classify the samples on the score plots. Unlike the cluster analysis approach, the linear discrimination analysis classification successfully distinguished anticancer drug-treated samples from the untreated controls. Moreover, three candidate amino acids (serine, aspartic acid, and methionine) were identified from the loading plots as potential biomarkers. Our proposed method might be able to evaluate the effectiveness of anticancer therapy even in small laboratories or medical institutions.Monosaccharide
Derivative (finance)
Repeatability
Cite
Citations (2)
T1A1*6 polymorphism (G/A).The patient was treated with FOLFIRI for 9 cycles and underwent two irinotecan dose reductions according to pharmacokinetic data regarding exposure to the active metabolite, SN-38.Simultaneous heterozygous UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms may produce higher exposure to SN-38 and a higher risk of adverse effects related to irinotecan.Additional studies will be necessary to determine the optimal starting dose of irinotecan for patients with both UGT1A1*28 and UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms.
SN-38
FOLFIRI
Cite
Citations (18)
Variants in UGT1A1 have previously been associated with toxicity from irinotecan chemotherapy. We conducted a pragmatic prospective cohort study to establish the relevance of UGT1A1 variants in the prediction of severe diarrhea and neutropenia in patients with colorectal cancer receiving irinotecan in a routine clinical setting.Genotyping of UGT1A1*28 and c.-3156G>A was undertaken in an unselected, prospective cohort of 96 individuals treated with irinotecan at a single major UK oncology centre. Data on cytotoxic drugs received, and toxicity for all irinotecan treatment cycles were collected from case notes. Over 95% (92/96) of patients received an intermediate dose of irinotecan (180 mg/m(2), twice weekly). Irinotecan was given in combination with other cytotoxic drugs in 93/96 subjects and Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred in 23% of subjects.No association was found between UGT1A1*28 or c.-3156G>A and neutropenia. However, individuals carrying two copies of UGT1A1*28 (p = 0.04; OR: 14; 95% CI: 1.1-185) or c.-3156G>A (p = 0.03) had a significantly increased risk of diarrhea over all cycles.Our findings indicate that UGT1A1 genotyping is not a good predictor of hematological toxicity in patients treated with intermediate irinotecan doses. However, it may be useful in the identification of patients at risk of severe diarrhea.
Cite
Citations (35)
Cite
Citations (2)
A new and rapid microwave assisted derivatization method for the determination of fatty acids in edible oil by GC MS was developed. The optimum conditions for derivatization, such as the derivatization solvent composition, microwave assisted derivatization pressure and time were studied for KOH methanol and H 2SO 4 methanol systems. The experimental results were compared with those obtained by traditional method of normal temperature derivatization .The applied range of the two derivatization systems was also discussed in detail. The derivatization was accomplished in 1 minute. Heptane was used as extraction solvent. The method is rapid, efficient, accurate and solvent saving.
Heptane
Cite
Citations (0)
PURPOSE: To investigate the sequence effect of irinotecan and a 48-hour infusion of fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated by leucovorin (LV) on the plasma pharmacokinetics of irinotecan and its metabolites, the toxicity profile of this combination, and irinotecan’s maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three metastatic colorectal cancer patients were randomized to receive a 60-minute infusion of irinotecan before or after a 48-hour infusion of 5-FU modulated by LV. The reverse sequence was used after 21 days for the second cycle. 5-FU 3,500 mg/m 2 was preceded by l-LV 250 mg/m 2 . Irinotecan 150 mg/m 2 (starting dose) was administered to the first three patients. The dose was escalated by 50 mg/m 2 in subsequent groups of three to six patients to determine the MTD for both sequences. Pharmacokinetic analysis of irinotecan and its metabolites was performed after each cycle. RESULTS: Toxicities were affected by the sequence of administration of irinotecan and 5-FU, with an improved tolerability for irinotecan followed by 5-FU. The irinotecan MTD was reached at 300 mg/m 2 when irinotecan followed 5-FU and at 450 mg/m 2 when it preceded 5-FU. In seven of 23 patients who received both sequences at identical irinotecan doses, the dose-limiting toxicity was observed only when irinotecan followed 5-FU. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the administration sequence significantly affected the SN-38 area under the concentration-versus-time curve (AUC), which was 40.1% lower (P < .05) when irinotecan preceded 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The sequence of treatment with irinotecan and infusional 5-FU affects the tolerability of this combination. This can be explained in part by a reduced SN-38 AUC when irinotecan preceded infusional 5-FU. Well-defined 5-FU/irinotecan regimens are needed because the administration sequence or the interval between the agents might affect treatment tolerance and perhaps also activity.
Tolerability
Camptothecin
SN-38
Cite
Citations (55)
Sample Preparation
Cite
Citations (7)
The combination of irinotecan and fluorouracil (5-FU) is synergistic when applied to human colon cancer cell lines in vitro and appears to be schedule-dependent: maximal activity occurs when irinotecan is administered prior to 5-FU. In this phase I study, irinotecan is administered in combination with UFT and leucovorin in patients with advanced solid tumors. Irinotecan is given as a 90-minute intravenous infusion on day 1 followed by twice-daily UFT plus oral leucovorin on days 2 through 15. Cycles are repeated every 21 days. Five patients have been treated to date; four are evaluable for toxicity. Starting doses were irinotecan 200 mg/m2/day, UFT 200 mg/m2/day, and leucovorin 60 mg/day. Preliminary results indicate that irinotecan in combination with UFT plus leucovorin is well tolerated at the initial doses (described in this article).
SN-38
Cite
Citations (1)
Camptothecin
Cite
Citations (50)