Evaluation of media for recovery of aerosolized bacteria

Disease transmission by airborne bacteria is well known. Bacterial burden in indoor air is estimated by sampling the air and estimating Colony Forming Units (CFU) using a variety of media. In this study, the recovery of bacteria, after aerosolization in an aerosol chamber, and employing a variety of media, was compared to that achieved using Tryptic Soy Agar medium. The total number of cells present was determined by direct microscopy. All trials were conducted at approximately the same relative humidity (RH) and temperature using the same collection device. Twelve species of bacteria were tested and a total of 120 media or media combinations were evaluated. Recovery on 64 media formulations was significantly lower for all strains examined, and therefore, excluded from further consideration for the purposes of this study. Data for 56 of the media are presented. Three species (Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus andSerratia marcescens) were selected as representative for reporting and testing recovery success. It is concluded that, for the media included in the study, there are large differences in recovery and successful recovery is related both to the effect of aerosolization and the type of medium employed for recovery. Brain Heart Infusion Agar (with horse serum), Tryptic Soy Agar and Mueller Hinton Agar yielded the best recoveries of aerosolized cultures. The most important finding was that only a small fraction of the airborne bacterial populations, enumerated by direct microscopy, could be recovered on any of the media tested, suggesting that culturable bacterial count is not a satisfactory means of estimating air microbial pollution.