An Isoelastic Monoblock Cup Retains More Acetabular and Femoral Bone Than a Modular Press-Fit Cup: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND For cup revision after total hip arthroplasty, sufficiently good periacetabular bone stock is a prerequisite for fixation of the revision implant. Cementless cups can lead to a relevant reduction of peri-implant bone mineral density (BMD) through stress-shielding. METHODS Fifty patients were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. Group 1 (RM group) received an isoelastic monoblock cup (RM Pressfit vitamys; Mathys). Group 2 (IT group) received a modular titanium cup (Allofit-S IT Alloclassic with a polyethylene liner; Zimmer). Periacetabular BMD was determined and subdivided into 4 regions of interest by dual x-ray absorptiometry at 1 week (baseline) and at 4 years postoperatively. Our primary outcome was reduction in periacetabular BMD. RESULTS Periacetabular BMD was reduced by an average of 15.1% in the RM group and 16.5% in the IT group at 4 years postoperatively. No significant difference was found between the 2 groups over the periacetabular structure as a whole. However, the decrease of BMD in the polar region was significantly different in the RM group (4.9% ± 10.0%) compared with the IT group (15.9% ± 14.9%, p = 0.005). Use of the isoelastic RM cup showed significantly less bone loss than the modular IT cup. CONCLUSIONS Relevant loss of BMD at 4 years after surgery was identified in the periacetabular region in both groups. No differences between the 2 cup systems were found when looking at the overall periacetabular region. As a secondary outcome, less postoperative periacetabular bone loss occurred in the polar region when an isoelastic cup was used. Longer follow-up is required to allow for conclusions to be drawn about the long-term course of the 2 cup systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.