Corrigendum to “The magnetic resonance aspect of a polyurethane meniscal scaffold is worse in advanced cartilage defects without deterioration of clinical outcomes after a minimum two-years follow-up” [Knee (2015) 389–394]

DOI of original article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2015.01.008. ⁎ Corresponding author at: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Sant Quinti, 89, 08041 Barcelona, Spain. Tel.: +34 93 553 70 31; fax: +34 93 553 70 33. E-mail address: pablogelber@gmail.com (P.E. Gelber). Fig. 3. MRI examination of a lateral compartment of the knee without chondral injury (ICRS grade 0) in 24 months after a medial Actifit® implantation. The sagittal spin-echo intermediate-weighted images showed that the Actifit® implant (white arrow) size was in this case identical to that of the normal meniscus (type 3) and that the signal intensity was slightly hyperintense (type 2). The interface between the prosthetic meniscus and the native meniscal tissue can no longer be observed.