Crown-rump length measurements revisited

1990 
Abstract Clinical and ultrasound data of 403 first-trimester pregnancies were collected prospectively. For our CRL study, two groups of patients were selected: Group A with an optimal (menstrual) history (111 patients, 156 CRL measurements) and Group B with available BBT charts (17 patients, 27 CRL measurements). Compared to the Robinson CRL curve (SD ± 4.7 days) the curve of group A (SD ± 4.4 days) showed a small underestimation of gestational age of 2.5 days in the 8th week, gradually declining (p In conclusion: in contrast to suggestions in literature there is no need to revise the original CRL curve of Robinson. For individual variations in CRL measurements not only measure errors but also variations in the time of implantation and/or start of growth are responsible.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    13
    References
    10
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []