The Braden Scale for Predicting the Outcome and Prognosis of Pressure Injuries in Older Inpatients: A Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION The Braden scale is used to assess the risk of patients with pressure injuries (PIs), but there are limitations to the prediction of PI healing. There is a lack of tools for evaluating PI healing and outcome in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of the Braden scale to predict the outcome and prognosis of PIs in older patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Outcome indicator was the wound healing rate of patients with PIs at discharge. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration. RESULTS Completed data were available for 309 patients, 181 of whom (58.6%) were male. The Braden scale had poor discrimination to predict the outcome and prognosis of PIs with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.56-0.70; P = .01). Subgroup analyses showed the Braden scale had low diagnostic value for patients aged over 90 years (AUCROC = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.17-0.96; P = .738), patients with respiratory diseases (AUCROC = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.37-0.65; P = .908), and digestive system diseases (AUCROC = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.75; P = .342). The level of calibration ability by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test was acceptable, defined as P >.200 (χ2 = 6.59; P = .473). In patients aged more than 90 years (χ2 = 4.88; P = .431) and female patients (χ2 = 7.03; P = .425), the Braden scale was also fitting. It was not suitable for patients with respiratory diseases (χ2 = 11.35; P = .078). CONCLUSIONS The Braden scale had low discrimination for predicting the outcome and prognosis of PIs in older inpatients. The development of a new tool is needed to predict healing in patients with preexisting PIs.