Ilizarov fixator pin site infection: A comparison between transverse wires and half pins.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the difference in the infection rates between Ilizarov wires and half-pins in routine practice. Methods This was an observational, prospective; single-centre study approved by the institutional ethics committee. Hundred cases were treated from June 2014 to May 2018 at Ilizarov Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Liaquat University of Medical & Health Sciences Jamshoro Sindh Pakistan. All patients were subjected to an evaluation of half-pins and Ilizarov wires. Patients with monolateral fixators were excluded from the study. The demographic data included patient's age and sex, surgical indication, application and removal of Ilizarov fixator, follow-up duration and type of pin (transverse wire or half pin) used. Non probability consecutive sampling technique was used and sample size was calculated randomly. RESULTS Of the total 100 cases, 79(79%) were male and 21(21%) were female with a mean age of 42.8±8.2 years. A total of 890 pins were applied in 100 patients with 170(19.10%) Half pins and 720(80.89%) wires. The transverse wire's infection rate according to Paley's grading system of Pin tract infection was, 46(53.48%), 25(29.06%) and 15(17.44%) in Grade I, Grade II and Grade III respectively. In case of half pin's infection, the majority of the cases were categories in grade II 22(55.0%) followed by Grade I 12(30.0%) and Grade III 06(15.0%). CONCLUSIONS The tensioned transverse wires had a significantly low infection rate as compared to half pins.