An example of some procedures used to assess HACCP systems within the food manufacturing industry

Abstract This paper is presented as a straightforward and practical description of the procedures typically used within the food manufacturing industry for assessing both HACCP Plans and their implementation. It is not written with reference to any previous commentaries on this topic and, therefore, a full analysis of the existing literature has not been undertaken. It will, however, consider the questions posed by the WHO consultation background paper in addition to providing an outline of the procedures used internally. The views presented are those of the author together with input from colleagues in other areas of the UK manufacturing industry (see Reference section). It does not, necessarily, reflect the views of the Pillsbury Company nor any of it`s associates. The purpose of assessing HACCP is to establish whether the food business operator has the ability to consistently provide safe food. Verification that the HACCP system is effective in maintaining product supply can be accomplished within the process of assessment. This paper discusses an industry approach of a two-stage programme of “pre-assessment” and “on-site assessment” which establishes that the manufacturer has: 1. implemented a sound HACCP system, 2. the knowledge and experience needed to maintain it, 3. the necessary support (or prerequisite) programmes in place. Food safety management will stand or fall on the competency of the people involved – those who prepare the HACCP Plan – those who operate it – and those who assess it. Throughout the process of assessment there is a need for properly trained assessors with auditing skills, relevant industry experience and food safety awareness. This paper proposes that regulation should be in place to control the standard and competency of assessors. This paper proposes some form of document which provides evidence that the HACCP Plan has been assessed as being satisfactory. However, it is likely that a one-off assessment, particularly a first assessment, may not be a truly valid test of the satisfactory nature of the system. With appropriate regulatory standards, a certification process which demands long term commitment from the business being assessed is favoured. To enable this, classification of establishments in terms of risk in order to guide the frequency and depth of assessment is recommended.