Root-End Surgery or Nonsurgical Retreatment: Are There Differences in Long-Term Outcome?

Abstract Introduction The decision of which modality of secondary endodontic treatment to perform is multifactorial and clinician dependent. The literature surrounding the long-term survival of nonsurgical retreatment compared with surgical retreatment remains equivocal and warrants further investigation. This 7-year retrospective study seeks to compare the outcome of nonsurgical retreatments with that of root-end surgeries performed on teeth without prior nonsurgical retreatments. Methods Insurance claims from 1021 teeth of 987 patients in the Delta Dental of Wisconsin database were analyzed from the years 2008–2017. Tooth survival was evaluated using Cox regression models, and the P value was set at .05. Survival time was considered from the time of completion of nonsurgical retreatment or root-end surgery to the time of an untoward event, which was defined as extraction after root-end surgery or extraction/root-end surgery after nonsurgical retreatment. Only procedures performed by endodontists were included in the analysis. Results The survival rate of teeth that received nonsurgical retreatment was 90% after 2 years, 86.8% after 4 years, and 85% after 6 years. The survival rate of teeth that received root-end surgery was 93.7% after 2 years, 90.5% after 4 years, and 88% after 6 years. No statistically significant difference was found in the survival of nonsurgical retreatment compared with root-end surgery. Likewise, no statistically significant difference was found within or between tooth types (anterior, premolar, or molar) when comparing nonsurgical retreatment with root-end surgery. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that clinicians can choose either nonsurgical retreatment or root-end surgery after failed primary root canal therapy. Tooth location was not a determining factor in the survival rate after nonsurgical retreatment or root-end surgery.