Encainide for the Treatment of Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients Undergoing Programmed Electrical Stimulation

Encainide was evaluated in 26 patients undergoing programmed electrical stimulation (PES) for ventricular arrhythmias. These patients had inducible symptomatic ventricular tachyarrhythmias during baseline PES and had previously failed a mean of 3.2 antiarrhythmic agents. Encainide was discontinued in six patients prior to PES because of spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) (five patients) and adverse effect (one patient). Encainide increased, the PR, QRS, QTc intervals, and right ventricular effective refractory period (RVERP) significantly from baseline (P < 0.05) in 16 patients who were extensive metabolizers. Encainide, at a mean dose of 110 ± 28 mg/day increased the ventricular tachycardia cycle length (VTCL) from 278 ± 77.1 msec to 334 ± 68.8 msec (P < 0.05). Encainide alone was effective (< 15 beats induced) or partially effective (converting inducible sustained VT to < 15 beats asymptomatic nonsustained VT or increasing the VTCL < 100 msec with no symptoms) in two and seven patients respectively. In seven patients, encainide was also reevaluated at a higher dose (mean dose 148 ± 22 mg/day), but this dose did not significantly alter the overall response or measured parameters. Seven patients were subsequently evaluated on combination of encainide and another antiarrhythmic agent. The combination was effective in three patients and partially effective in three patients. Serum concentrations were measured during each testing period; a moderate correlation was observed between the PR and RR intervals and total concentrations in patients who were extensive metabolizers. Eleven patients who were effective or partially effective during acute testing were placed on long-term encainide therapy (three patients alone and eight patients on combination therapy). In a mean follow-up of 8.9 months (1–25 months) encainide was discontinued in five patients (two patients due to nonsudden cardiac death, one patient due to recurrent nonfatal VT, and two patients due to side effects of combination therapy.) Conclusion: Encainide alone is minimally effective (7.7%) for preventing inducible ventricular tachycardia, but partially effective in 38.9%. Retesting at a higher dose does not offer any additional benefit. However, encainide in combination with another antiarrhythmic agent may improve the response in patients who remain inducible on encainide alone. Further studies are needed to verify this observation.