Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial

Abstract Data from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and optical scans (intraoral or model scanner) are required for computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS). This study compared the accuracy of implant position when placed with CAIS guides produced by intraoral and extraoral (model) scanning. Forty-seven patients received 60 single implants by means of CAIS. Each implant was randomly assigned to either the intraoral group (n = 30) (Trios Scanner, 3Shape) or extraoral group (n = 30), in which stereolithographic surgical guides were manufactured after conventional impression and extraoral scanning of the stone model (D900L Lab Scanner, 3Shape). CBCT and surface scan data were imported into coDiagnostiX software for virtual implant position planning and surgical guide design. Postoperative CBCT scans were obtained. Software was used to compare the deviation between the planned and final positions. Average deviation for the intraoral vs. model scan groups was 2.42° ± 1.47° vs. 3.23° ± 2.09° for implant angle, 0.87 ± 0.49 mm vs. 1.01 ± 0.56 mm for implant platform, and 1.10 ± 0.53 mm vs. 1.38 ± 0.68 mm for implant apex; there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P > 0.05). CAIS conducted with stereolithographic guides manufactured by means of intraoral or extraoral scans appears to result in equal accuracy of implant positioning.