Programmed Chest‐Wall Stimulation to Evaluate the Progress of A‐V Block After Pacemaker Insertion in Patients with Trifascicular Disease

Twenty six patients faged 46-80, mean age 64) with bifascicular block in the presence of prolonged H-V interval (trifascicular block), were followed for an average of 31 months after inserting an R-wave inhibited pacemaker (PM) because of syncope and/or dizzy attacks. The underlying rhythm was evaluated at 4–6-month intervals by three different techniques; 1) 12-lead ECG when intrinsic patient rate was faster than PM rate; 2) abrupt PM inhibition (APMI) by the rapid chest-wall stimulation technique, and 3) progressive PM inhibition (PPMl) using a programmed chest-wall stimulation technique capable of decreasing the PM rate gradually to 30 beats/min before complete PM inhibition. In addition, (he PPMl allowed the underlying rhythm to be induced and sustained and properly evaluated without any discomfort to the patient. Following PM insertion, 4 patients (15%) developed complete hear! block after a mean follow-up of 43 months, and one patient (4%) developed 2nd degree 2:1 A-V block (VX) after 83 months. The P-R interval increased in 5 patients (19%) and decreased in 2 (8%j. No change of A-V conduction was found in 9 patients (34%). Three patients developed low atrial rhythm, atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation, respectively (12%). After PM insertion 2 patients still complained of dizziness. None reported syncope. Two patients died during follow-up, both of congestive heart failure (8%). By detection of intrinsic rhythm it was recognized that a long symptomatic paroxysmal phase may precede the development of chronic complete A-V block. Therefore, the insertion of a permanent PM is recommended in patients with unexplained neurologic symptoms and trifascicular disease, without waiting for documented episodes of complete A-V block. (PACE, Vol. 5, September-October, 1982)