Auditory Nerve Fiber Responses to Combined Acoustic and Electric Stimulation

Persons with a prosthesis implanted in a cochlea with residual acoustic sensitivity can, in some cases, achieve better speech perception with “hybrid” stimulation than with either acoustic or electric stimulation presented alone. Such improvements may involve “across auditory-nerve fiber” processes within central nuclei of the auditory system and within-fiber interactions at the level of the auditory nerve. Our study explored acoustic–electric interactions within feline auditory nerve fibers (ANFs) so as to address two goals. First, we sought to better understand recent results that showed non-monotonic recovery of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) following acoustic masking (Nourski et al. 2007, Hear. Res. 232:87–103). We hypothesized that post-masking changes in ANF temporal properties and responsiveness (spike rate) accounted for the ECAP results. We also sought to describe, more broadly, the changes in ANF responses that result from prior acoustic stimulation. Five response properties—spike rate, latency, jitter, spike amplitude, and spontaneous activity—were examined. Post-masking reductions in spike rate, within-fiber jitter and across-fiber variance in latency were found, with the changes in temporal response properties limited to ANFs with high spontaneous rates. Thus, our results suggest how non-monotonic ECAP recovery occurs for ears with spontaneous activity, but cannot account for that pattern of recovery when there is no spontaneous activity, including the results from the presumably deafened ears used in the Nourski et al. (2007) study. Finally, during simultaneous (electric+acoustic) stimulation, the degree of electrically driven spike activity had a strong influence on spike rate, but did not affect spike jitter, which apparently was determined by the acoustic noise stimulus or spontaneous activity.