A comment on "The GTCC stored charge model"

Hamel and Selvakumar (ibid., vol. 38, pp. 1467-76, 1991) have criticized the Klose and Weider, transient integral charge control (TICC) charge partitioning model (see ibid., vol. 34, pp. 1090-9, 1987) in comparison with their generalized transient charge control (GTCC) relation. In addition, it is claimed (Hamel, ibid., vol. 40, pp. 1713-16, 1993) '...the problem of rigorously determining the charge partitioning in one dimension has now been rectified...' We wish to demonstrate that the analytic basis of the GTCC model presented is completely fallacious. >