Influence of malic acid-heat treatment for protecting sunflower protein against ruminal degradation on in vitro methane production: A comparison with the use of malic acid as an additive

Abstract Batch cultures of rumen microorganisms were used to compare the fermentation of sunflower seed (SS) and meal (SM) treated with malic acid and heat (MAH; 150 °C for 1 h) to protect the protein from ruminal degradation with that of the untreated samples supplemented the same amount of malate (as additive), either as free acid (MA) or disodium malate (DSM). As previous studies have shown the influence of donors’ diet on in vitro fermentation, cultures were inoculated with ruminal fluid from four sheep fed a medium-concentrate diet (MC; 50:50 hay:concentrate) or a high-concentrate diet (HC; 15:85 barley straw:concentrate) in a cross-over experimental design. Cultures were sampled at 6 and 16.5 h of fermentation. In 16.5 h incubations, MAH treatment reduced ( P   0.001) CH 4 production and ammonia-N concentrations for both substrates (by 60.3 and 45.3% for SS and by 23.7 and 17.2% for SM substrate, respectively). Whereas the MAH treatment reduced total volatile fatty (VFA) production by 16.5% for SS substrate, no effects were observed for SM substrate ( P  = 0.441). For both substrates, adding the same amount of MA to untreated samples (as a feed additive) resulted in greater CH 4 production and ammonia-N concentrations compared with the MAH treatment. A positive relationship ( P 3 N and CH 4 production at both incubation times for both substrates. Compared with the untreated feeds, MA and DSM did not affect ( P  > 0.05) CH 4 production for either substrate, but reduced ammonia-N concentrations (13.8%; P  = 0.004) for SM substrate. Compared with DSM, MA treatment resulted in greater ( P  0.05) production of gas, butyrate, isovalerate and valerate and tended ( P   0.10) to greater total VFA, and propionate production for SS substrate at 6 h incubation, but most differences disappeared after 16.5 h incubation. For some fermentation parameters, the response to MAH treatment was more pronounced by using fluid from sheep fed the HC diet than that from MC-fed sheep. In conclusion, the MAH treatment was more effective at reducing CH 4 emissions and NH 3 N concentrations than the supplementation of malic acid or disodium malate as a feed additive.