Rural-urban Differences in Hiv testing among Us Adults: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

Background Individuals in rural areas of the United States face barriers to HIV-related healthcare. We aim to assess differences in frequency of lifetime and past-year HIV testing, and differences in testing site location between rural and urban residents of the United States. Methods Data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2015 were analyzed on 250,579 respondents age >18 years. Weighted multinomial logistic regression analyses compared urban/rural differences in lifetime and past-year HIV testing. Weighted multinomial logistic regression compared urban/rural differences in HIV testing site. Results Overall, 26.9% of urban residents and 21.5% of rural residents reported testing for HIV in their lifetime. Of urban residents, 24.5% reported receiving an HIV test in the past year compared to 20.2% of rural residents. Living in a rural area was associated with lower odds of lifetime (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.81-0.90) and past-year HIV testing (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.95) compared to not testing. Rural residents had higher odds of receiving an HIV test at the hospital or emergency room (aOR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.23-1.62) or clinic (aOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.24) than a doctor’s office. Conclusions This study highlights significant rural health disparities in rates of lifetime and past-year HIV testing. Targeted interventions are needed to remove structural barriers in rural communities such as long distances to clinics and low availability of free HIV testing at clinics serving the un- or under-insured. Furthermore, rural providers should be encouraged to routinely offer HIV screening to their patients.