Effects of intravitreal connective tissue growth factor neutralizing antibody on choroidal neovascular membrane-associated subretinal fibrosis

Abstract Connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) plays an essential role in the regulation of extracellular matrix proteins and pro-fibrotic and angiogenic factors. This experimental research was conducted to evaluate if connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is elevated after induction of a choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) and whether intravitreal anti-CTGF without and with intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) may have any effect on the CNVM associated sub-retinal fibrosis. In adherence to ARRIVE guidelines, CNVM was induced by laser spots in the right eye retinas of ninety-four pigmented rats. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and western-blot analysis were performed on sclerochoroidal tissues of forty-four rats before and at different time intervals after laser application. The remaining fifty rats were randomly divided into five groups after laser application. Group A received intravitreal injection of 2 μl of the 50μg/ml anti-CTGF. In group B, intravitreal injection of 2 μl of 25 mg/ml bevacizumab was performed. Group C received 1 μl intravitreal anti-CTGF and 1 μl IVB. Group D did not receive any intravitreal injection as the control group. In group E, intravitreal injection of 2 μl of nonspecific purified mouse IgG antibody was performed as the placebo group. After two weeks, double immunohistochemistry was performed by isolectin B4 and anti-collagen type1 on the sclerochoroidal flat-mounts. Masked measurement of the fluorescent images of the CNVM and CNVM associated sub-retinal fibrosis areas was performed using the image J software. Ctgf mRNA and CTGF protein levels increased to the maximum level in 24 h after laser application and remained higher than the control level up to the 14th day for the Ctgf mRNA and up to the 7th day for the CTGF protein level. Means of CNVM associated sub-retinal fibrosis areas in three treatment groups (A, B and C) were significantly less than the controL (D) and placebo (E) groups (P