Ecophysiological and morphological adaption to soil flooding of two poplar clones differing in flood-tolerance

Abstract Responses to soil flooding of two poplar clones differing in flood-tolerance were studied to elucidate ecophysiological and morphological adaptation to hypoxia. Results showed that Populus deltoides cv. Lux ex. I-69/55 ( Lux ) was flood-tolerant, whereas P. simonii was flood-susceptible, based on structural and functional differences. They differed in morphological, ecophysiological, and anatomical characteristics when subjected to flooding. The difference between cv. Lux and P. simonii became particular obvious with increased length of the flooding period (8–22 days), but responses to flooding differed already during the first week of flooding. Ecophysiologically, in the beginning of flooding cv. Lux kept a high level of photosynthesis, showed a high free water content and water use efficiency at reduced leaf conductances and leaf water potentials. Chlorophyll content of cv. Lux was reduced so that sunlight absorption was lower as well and destruction of the photosynthesis system by photooxidation was avoided. Free protein content of Lux under flooding was also low, probably in favor of synthesis of other substances that enforce flood tolerance. On the contrary, in P. simonii transpiration only slowly decreased due to slow stomatal closure of leaves in the first day of flooding, and water potential decreased slowly, accompanied with high transformation rate of free water into bound water and low water use efficiency. Slow decomposition of chlorophyll of P. simonii resulted in overabundant light energy absorption and serious destruction of photosynthesis system II (PSII). Net photosynthesis of P. simonii seriously decreased under flooding. At the morphological level, cv. Lux developed many small and obviously functional hypertrophied lenticels throughout the flooding treatment. Bigger hypertrophied lenticels of P. simonii inclined to become rotten. Under complete submergency, cv. Lux could keep an intact leaf structure, whereas epidermis and structure of leaves of P. simonii were destroyed severely. Anatomically, the ultrastructures of leaves of cv. Lux were still intact at the end of flooding, whereas those of P. simonii were destroyed seriously, and many organelles were decomposed. The flood-tolerant poplar clone showed better mechanisms of avoiding oxygen scarcity and tolerating oxygen scarcity. By contrast, the flood-susceptible poplar clone possessed such mechanisms to an insufficient degree. Under soil flooding, rapid formation and maintenance of fine hypertrophied lenticels, a quick decrease of water potential and stomatal closure, keeping for some days still a high level of photosynthesis and water use efficiency, and maintaining intact structures of leaves and roots, etc. were critical traits to survival and growth of the flooding-tolerant poplar clone.