TREATMENT OF INTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURES:LONG TERM OUTCOME OF AO TYPE B VERSUS AO TYPE C FRACTURES

Background: It is well established that unstable fractures of the distal part of the radius may require operative treatment to restore alignment and that failure to restore alignment often leads to wrist and forearm dysfunction. There is ongoing debate in the literature whether or not there is a strict relationship between the quality of anatomical reconstruction and functional outcome. We hypothesize that there is no difference in objective- and subjective functional outcome between patients with AO type B versus more complex AO type C fractures. Methods: Ninety-four patients with an average age of 42 years (range, 20 to 78 years) at the time of injury were evaluated an average of 20 years (range, 8 to 32 years) after treatment of an intra-articular distal radius fracture. At long-term follow-up patients were evaluated using a physician-based evaluation instruments (modified Mayo wrist score; MMWS and an upper extremity-specific health status questionnaire (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; DASH) questionnaire. Objective and subjective functional outcome of patients with AO Type B and AO Type C fractures were compared. Results: An average of 20 years after injury (average age 62 years, range 35 to 90), all fractures healed without significant loss of alignment. There was no difference in physician based outcome measure according to the Mayo score between 17 patients with 18 AO type B fractures (average, 80,3 points; range 45 to 100) and 27 patients with 31 AO type C fractures (average, 75.9 points; range 10 to 95, p=0.42). Differences in subjective DASH scores were not statistically significant either (p = 0.47); average 13 points for Type B patients (range, 0 to 58 points) and an average of 16 points for Type C patients (range, 0 to 71 points). Groups were statistically comparable. No statistical differences were found in flexion extension arc (average 103 degrees, range 10 to 145 degrees), pronation supination arc (average 150 degrees, range 0 to 180 degrees) or radial ulnar deviation (average 52 degrees, range 0 to 85 degrees), as well as grip strength and osteoarthritis (all p>0.05) Conclusions: Twenty years after injury 67% of patients have a satisfactory outcome according to physician-based MMWS categorical ratings. There is no difference in functional long term outcome between patient with more extensive intra-articular comminution (type C fractures) and AO type B fractures. This is consistent with previous long term outcome studies with similar methodology; when more complex injuries are not correlated with decreased long term functional outcome, other (subjective) factors are more important determinants of disability.