Approaching indeterminate thyroid nodules in the absence of molecular markers: “The BETH-TR score”

2020 
Context: Given the lack of easy access to molecular markers for indeterminate thyroid nodules (Bethesda (BETH) category III, IV), the clinician can either decide to get a second opinion from an expert high-volume thyroid cytopathologist, redo the FNAC after a period of 3–6 months, or send the patient for a diagnostic hemithyroidectomy. Reviewing the sonographic risk features is also one way of triaging these nodules. The ACR-TIRADS (TR) is an objective method of sonographic risk assessment and is superior to other forms of sonographic classification. Aim: We propose combining the scoring of the TR category and BETH category (both expressed as a numerical value and summated) and look at the score which could potentially guide the clinician in deciding whom to send for surgery. Settings and Design: Observational prospective collection of consecutive patient data from the thyroid FNAC clinic. Statistical Analysis Used: The BETH categories were represented numerically and summated with the TR category. The categorical outcome variables of benign and malignant nodules and the summated score was analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: We analyzed 450 FNAC data, out of which 403 were thyroid nodule aspirates. Out of these nodules, 96 of them underwent surgery and 64% of these nodules were malignant on final histopathology (malignant = 62 and benign = 34). The mean size of the benign nodules was 3.6 ± 2.2 cm compared to 2.8 ± 1.8 cm of the malignant nodules. After excluding those with BETH 1 (n = 4), the mean BETH-TR score for benign nodules was 6 ± 1.4 and malignant nodules 9.4 ± 2.1 (P
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    14
    References
    1
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []