Criminal law and mental illness
2015
The paper deals with the problem of criminal law reaction to behavior of
mentally ill, insane offenders who violate or threaten the criminal law
protected values. To the preliminary question of whether the criminal
reaction is generally justified in regard to quasi-criminal acts of mentally
ill persons (which are not criminal in the true sense because they lack mens
rea which is a constituent element of each offense), the answer is still yes.
There are no other, more appropriate forms of social control, or other legal
mechanisms that could more effectively than the criminal law, while
respecting the safeguards that have become indispensable in criminal law,
protect important goods of the individual or society from the harmful
behavior of mentally ill persons. Although the entire criminal law is based
on guilt and the subjective attitude of the offender towards the criminal
offense for which he is exposed to the social-ethical reprimand, it is
excluded in case of mentally ill, insane offenders and implementation of
appropriate security measures. Capabilities of criminal law in performing a
protective function relative to mentally ill offenders are certainly more
modest than in case of perpetrators who can be held accountable. The entire
general prevention (whether positive or negative) underlying protective
function of criminal law, is almost inconceivable in relation to potential
offenders who are mentally ill. Available options are reduced to detention
and psychiatric treatment of the mentally ill offender. The application of
security measures to insane, mentally ill persons is limited, therefore,
mainly to certain aspects of special prevention. Even exercising social
control through criminal law differs, significantly, depending on whether we
talk about incompetent, mentally ill persons or those who have normal mental
abilities.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
0
References
0
Citations
NaN
KQI