Parent engagement in perinatal mortality reviews: An online survey of clinicians from six high income countries
2020
OBJECTIVE Parent engagement in perinatal mortality review meetings following stillbirth may benefit parents and improve patient safety. We investigated perinatal mortality review meeting practices, including the extent of parent engagement, based on self-reports from health care professionals from maternity care facilities in six high income countries. DESIGN Cross-sectional online survey Setting Australia; New Zealand; United Kingdom; Ireland; United States; and Canada. Population A total of 1,104 health care professionals, comprising mainly obstetricians, gynaecologists, midwives and nurses. METHODS Data were drawn from responses to a survey covering stillbirth-related topics. Open- and closed-items that focused on "Data quality on causes of stillbirth" were analysed. Main Outcome Measures Health care professionals' self-reported practices around perinatal mortality review meetings following stillbirth. RESULTS Most clinicians (81.0%) were aware of regular audit meetings to review stillbirth at their maternity facility, although this was true for only 35.5% of US respondents. For 854 respondents whose facility held regular meetings, less than a third (31.1%) reported some form of parent engagement, although this was usually as one-way post-meeting feedback. Across all six countries, only 17.1% of respondents described an explicit approach where parents provided input, received feedback and were represented at meetings. CONCLUSIONS We found no established practice of involving parents in the perinatal mortality review process in six high income countries. Parent engagement may hold the key to important lessons for stillbirth prevention and care. Further understanding of approaches, barriers and enablers is warranted. Funding Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Australia, provided infrastructure and funding to enable this work to be undertaken.
Keywords:
- Correction
- Source
- Cite
- Save
- Machine Reading By IdeaReader
9
References
1
Citations
NaN
KQI