Consteel© EAF and conventional EAF: a comparison in maintenance practices

2010 
The present paper highlights the main differences between Consteel® and conventional EAF technologies regarding scheduled and unscheduled maintenance practices. The study has been made on the basis of data collected in plants with high maintenance standards and more than 10 years of operational experience. These data have been analyzed and organized in a comparison table where they have been associated with the relevant maintenance costs. The comparison shows that the Consteel® technology achieves a significant reduction in the overall maintenance costs compared to a conventional EAF.
    • Correction
    • Source
    • Cite
    • Save
    • Machine Reading By IdeaReader
    0
    References
    3
    Citations
    NaN
    KQI
    []