Comparison of the outcomes of pediatric tibial shaft fractures treated by different types of orthopedists: A prospective cohort study

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pediatric tibial shaft fractures treated with titanium elastic nail (TEN) by pediatric orthopedists and non-pediatric orthopedists. Materials and methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of 90 children of tibial shaft fractures, who were randomized to operative stabilization either by pediatric orthopedists (Group A, 45 cases) or by non-pediatric orthopedists (Group B, 45 cases) from April 2010 to May 2015. Demographic data and clinical characteristics (age, sex, weight, fracture side and type, cause of injury, number of fibula fracture and time from injury to operation) were comparable between the two groups before surgery. Clinical data, complications and functional outcomes between the two groups were recorded. Results A total of 10 patients were lost to follow-up for various reasons and each group remained 40 cases. The mean follow-up period was 14.9 ± 1.9 months for Group A and 15.3 ± 2.2 months for Group B (P = 0.451). There was no significant difference in length of hospitalization, full weight-bearing time, fracture union time and TEN outcome scores between the two groups (P = 0.917, P = 0.352, P = 0.404, P = 506, respectively). However, Group A exhibited significantly shorter operation duration and less fluoroscopy times than Group B (P  Conclusions Our results indicated that pediatric tibial shaft fractures treated surgically by pediatric orthopedists offered potential advantages including a shorter operating time, less times of fluoroscopy and a lower rate of open reduction. However, both pediatric and non-pediatric orthopedists could achieve satisfactory clinical results in treatment of these injuries.