Comparison of two stable hydrogen isotope-ratio measurement techniques on Antarctic surface-water and ice samples

Abstract A comparison of the new hydrogen isotope-ratio technique of Vaughn et al. ([Vaughn, B.H., White, J.W.C., Delmotte, M., Trolier, M., Cattani, O., Stievenard, M., 1998. An automated system for hydrogen isotope analysis of water. Chem. Geol. (Isot. Geosci. Sect.), 152, 309–319]; the article immediately preceding this article) for the analysis of water samples utilizing automated on-line reduction by elemental uranium showed that 94% of 165 samples of Antarctic snow, ice, and stream water agreed with the δ 2 H values determined by H 2 –H 2 O platinum equilibration, exhibiting a bias of +0.5‰ and a 2− σ variation of 1.9‰. The isotopic results of 10 reduction technique samples, however, gave δ 2 H values that differed by 3.5‰ or more, and were too negative by as much as 5.4‰ and too positive by as much as 4.9‰ with respect to those determined using the platinum equilibration technique.