The anatomical position of three extraglottic airway devices in patients with clear airways

We tested the hypothesis that, in patients with clear airways, the anatomical position of three single-use extraglottic airway devices is similar. The airways studied were: the laryngeal mask airway unique (LMA-U™), the Softseal laryngeal mask airway (SS-LM™) and the Cobra perilaryngeal airway (Cobra-PLA™). Three hundred spontaneously breathing patients were randomly allocated to have their airway managed using one of these three supraglottic airway devices. A rigid endoscope was passed down the airway tube and the following anatomical assessments were made: position of the epiglottis; position of the glottis; and position of the cuff. The epiglottis was more frequently visible with the LMA-U than with the SS-LM (76 vs 57%, p = 0.006) and with the LMA-U than with the Cobra-PLA (76 vs 46%, p < 0.0001). The epiglottis was in contact with the mask aperture bars in 25% of patients, and in 34% of these, the epiglottis was seen to be herniated through the aperture bars. Herniation of the epiglottis through the mask aperture bars occurred more frequently with the Cobra-PLA than the LMA-U (8 vs 3%, p = 0.008). The vocal cords and arytenoids were more frequently visible with the LMA-U and SS-LM than with the Cobra-PLA (both p < 0.006). Herniation of the arytenoids through the mask aperture bars was more frequently seen with the Cobra-PLA than with the LMA-U (8 vs 0%, p = 0.004). The position of the cuff was optimal for the LMA-U and SS-LM in 90% and 93% of patients, respectively. The cuff was more frequently in the midline with the LMA-U than with the SS-LM (p = 0.002). We conclude that the anatomical position of the LMA-U and SS-LMA is superior to that of the Cobra-PLA in patients with clear airways. The mask aperture bars probably have no anatomical utility and predispose to herniation of the pharyngeal structures.