A statement on abortion by 100A professors of obstetrics: 40 years later

Clinical Opinion www. AJOG .org GENERAL GYNECOLOGY A statement on abortion by 100 professors of obstetrics: 40 years later One Hundred Professors of Obstetrics and Gynecology F orty years ago, leaders in obstetrics and gynecology published a com- pelling statement that recognized the legalization of abortion in several states and anticipated the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade. 1 They projected the numbers of legal abortions that likely would be required by women in the United States and described the role of the teaching hospital in meeting that responsibility. 1 They wrote to ex- press their concern for women’s health in a new legal and medical era of re- productive control and to define the responsibilities of academic obstetrician- gynecologists. Since then, we have advanced the fields of reproduction and family planning. Thanks to these developments, women can now prevent pregnancy with safer and more effective forms of contracep- tion (most recently long-acting revers- ible methods), with simple and sensitive hormonal and sonographic methods to determine pregnancy status and dura- tion, and with new methods of infer- tility treatment and prenatal testing that rely on the option of terminating inten- ded pregnancies that are diagnosed as abnormal. To terminate pregnancies, cli- nicians now use misoprostol and mife- pristone for “medical abortion” (which in 2009 accounted for 16.5% of termina- tions in the United States and can be office-based) and use sonographic guid- ance of intrauterine procedures along with new methods for inducing cervical dilation and uterine contraction; patients From the 100 Professors (Appendix). Received Dec. 3, 2012; revised Jan. 23, 2013; accepted March 7, 2013. The author reports no conflict of interest. Reprints not available from the authors. a 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.03.007 In this Journal in 1972, 100 leaders in obstetrics and gynecology published a compelling statement that recognized the legalization of abortion in several states and anticipated the 1973 Supreme Court decision in Roe v Wade. They projected the numbers of legal abortions that likely would be required by women in the United States and described the role of the teaching hospital in meeting that responsibility. They wrote to express their concern for women’s health in a new legal and medical era of reproductive control and to define the responsibilities of academic obstetrician-gynecologists. Forty years later, 100 professors examine the statement of their predecessors in light of medical advances and legal changes and suggest a further course of action for obstetrician gynecologists. Key words: abortion, law, teaching hospital benefit from innovations in counseling and new approaches to pain control. 2-6 Studies of abortion practice and out- comes are also much more sophisticated than they were 40 years ago. 7,8 We have had 40 years of medical progress but have witnessed political regression that the 100 professors did not anticipate. In 2011 alone, 24 states passed 92 legislative restrictions on abortion. 9 Waiting periods after consent are now law in 26 states. Alabama, Arizona, Florida, Kansas, Louisiana, North Car- olina, Oklahoma and Texas require pa- tients to view ultrasound images and, in Arizona, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, to listen to fetal heart beats. 10 Laws in 27 states force physicians to provide deceptive counseling including false statements about risks of breast cancer, infertility and mental health. They include laws to limit second-trimester abortion under the guise of protecting the fetus from pain (Alabama, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, and Oklahoma). 11 Laws directed specif- ically at medical education in Arizona, Kansas, and Texas prohibit abortion training in public institutions and another 7 states ban abortion in public hospitals, precluding training in them. 12 What vision of the future of legalized abortion did the 100 professors have? How accurately did they estimate the need for safe, legal abortion and antici- pate their colleagues’ willingness and commitment to meeting it? They wrote, “In view of the impending change in abortion practices generated by new state legislation and federal court de- cisions, we believe it helpful to [respond] to this increasingly liberal course of events.by contributing to the solution of an imminent problem.” 1 Forty years later, the change is not liberal. Its effects will threaten, not improve, women’s health and already obstruct physicians’ evidence-based and patient-centered practices. We review our predecessors’ 1972 statement and judge how it com- ports with what actually occurred and with legislation that has been adopted over the 40 years since their writing and the passage of Roe v Wade. The 100 professors were remarkably prescient in anticipating the need for 1 million legal abortions and today’s abortion rate of 1 in 4 pregnancies. 13,14 They predicted that teaching hospitals with specialized outpatient facilities could meet the demand and believed that abortions were the responsibility of hospitals. But today, 90% of abortions, which include the 10% that are in the second trimester, are done away from hospitals. 15 Many hospitals enforce fetal and maternal health restrictions that are not based in the law but are MONTH 2013 American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology FLA 5.1.0 DTD ! YMOB9193_proof ! 15 April 2013 ! 10:46 am ! ce