Clinical judgement of General Practitioners for the diagnosis of dementia

BackgroundThe accuracy of General Practitioners (GPs) clinical judgement for diagnosing dementia is uncertain. AimInvestigate the accuracy of GPs clinical judgement for the diagnosis of dementia. Design and SettingDiagnostic test accuracy study, recruiting from 21 practices around Bristol. MethodThe clinical judgement of the treating GP (index test) was based on the information immediately available at their initial consultation with a person aged over 70 years who had symptoms of possible dementia. The reference standard was an assessment by a specialist clinician, based on a standardised clinical examination and made according to ICD-10 criteria for dementia. Results240 people were recruited, with a median age of 80 years (IQR 75 to 84 years), of whom 126 (53%) were men and 132 (55%) had dementia. The median duration of symptoms was 24 months (IQR 12 to 36 months) and the median ACE-III score was 75 (IQR 65 to 87). GP clinical judgement had sensitivity 56% (95% CI 47% to 65%) and specificity 89% (95% CI 81% to 94%). Positive likelihood ratio was higher in people aged 70-79 years (6.5, 95% CI 2.9 to 15) compared to people aged [≥] 80 years (3.6, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.6), and in women (10.4, 95% CI 3.4 to 31.7) compared to men (3.2, 95% CI 1.7 to 6.2), whereas the negative likelihood ratio was similar in all groups. ConclusionGP judgement is more likely to under identify rather than over identify dementia. O_TEXTBOXHow this fits in Previous studies in this area have investigated the accuracy of GP clinical judgement as a screening test for dementia in unselected people attending a primary care clinic; or as a retrospective test based on their knowledge of their patient; or derived the accuracy of judgement from the medical records, which may not reflect the judgement of the clinician. The role of the GP in supporting a more effective route to diagnosis for people with dementia is a research priority for patients, carers and clinicians. This study shows that, in a symptomatic older adult, prospective clinical judgement may be useful for helping to confirm a diagnosis of dementia, whereas GP judgement should not by itself be used to exclude dementia. C_TEXTBOX