Correction to “Photocatalytic Water Splitting with Suspended Calcium Niobium Oxides: Why Nanoscale is Better than Bulk – A Kinetic Analysis”

I the original manuscript, eq 1 calculates the overall electronic rate ER [mol s−1 cm−3] as the product of the individual rates for e/h generation, charge transport, redox reactions, and so on. This is physically impossible, as it can lead to ER values that are several times larger than the net electron/ hole generation rate RG−RR−RR. The corrected eq 1 is shown below. Instead of calculating the overall catalytic rate as a product of the individual ones, ER is given by the inverse sum of the inverse individual rates. This is equivalent to the overall conductance of an arrangement of conductances connected in series.