The origin of the heartbeat and theories of muscle contraction. Physiological concepts and conflicts in the 19th century.

Abstract The origin of the incessant rhythmical heartbeat and the mechanism of muscle contraction have fascinated scientists over centuries. This short review outlines physiological explanations that were discussed in the 19th century starting with Albrecht von Haller (1708–1777), an 18th century physiologist who proposed that the heart has an intrinsic irritability. He argued that under normal conditions the inflow of blood stimulates the heart muscle to contract by mechanical touch and distension. Johannes Muller (1800–1858, physiologist in Bonn and Berlin) contended that the influence of the sympathetic nerve, specifically the activity of intracardiac ganglia, is the foremost cause of the heartbeat. Walter H. Gaskell and Theodor Engelmann (physiologists in Cambridge and Utrecht, respectively) independently criticized this neurogenic theory. They reported experimental evidence that supported the myogenic theory of the origin of the heartbeat, which has been accepted since about 1900. The concept of cardiac mechano-sensitivity, which can be traced back to A. von Haller, is currently resurging. Concerning mechanisms of contraction, Edward A. Schafer (1850–1935), histologist and physiologist in Edinburgh, described differences between cardiac and skeletal muscle and coined the term sarcomere. Based on microscopic studies of cross-striated muscle, Schafer outlined a detailed and plausible mechanism of muscle contraction in 1892. He put forward that during muscle shortening the “clear part of the muscle substance” (actin) might pass into longitudinal canals, which exist between the “sarcous elements” (myosin). His model foresaw fundamental elements of the sliding filament model, which was discovered by the Huxleys about 60 years later.