Estudo comparativo da termoablação da veia safena magna na coxa, com e sem tumescência

Background Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous veins offers patients a procedure with low rates of complications and an early return to occupational activities. Objective To compare rates of formation of bruising, of paresthesia along the path of the great saphenous vein (GSV), and of GSV obliteration 30 days after thermal ablation in the thigh, performed with or without tumescence and using two different types of fiber. Methods This was a prospective study, analyzing three groups of patients who underwent GSV thermal ablation in the thigh, using a wavelength of 1470 nm. Patients in group 1 were treated with a conventional fiber using tumescence; those in group 2 were treated with a conventional fiber without using tumescence; and patients in group 3 were treated with a double radial fiber without tumescence. After 30 days, the rates of obliteration shown by Doppler ultrasonography, of paresthesias, and of bruising were compared. Results Comparison of the results of thermal ablation of 90 GSVs in the thigh revealed similar rates of obliteration, with no statistical differences. The rate of paresthesia along the path of the GSV in the thigh was higher in the groups without tumescence than in the group with tumescence, but the difference only attained statistical significance for the comparison with the group that was treated with the conventional fiber. There was bruising in all groups, with greater frequency in group 1 (73.33%). Conclusions Tumescence proved useful for preventing minor neurological injuries, but didn’t have any influence on the rates of bruising occurrence or of occlusion of the GSV in the thigh up to 30 days after thermal ablation.